Skip to main content
  • 144 Accesses

Abstract

The methods described in this chapter could, as an alternative, have been termed ‘null methods’; the measurement process being to reduce the difference between a known and an unknown quantity to zero, that is, a null would be indicated. Such methods have inherently a greater precision than direct measurements, for example, by such methods it is possible to compare two voltages of the order of 1 V using a detector that has a resolution in terms of microvolts. The accuracy of such methods must, however, depend on the limits of error that apply to the particular ‘standard’ quantity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. W. Golding and F. C. Widdis. Electrical Measurements and Measuring Instruments. Pitman, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. C. Gall. Direct and Alternating Current Potentiometer Measurements. Chapman and Hall, London (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. S. Luppold. Precision D.C. Measurements and Standards. Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Hauge and T. R. Foord. A.C. Bridge Methods ( 6th edn. ). Pitman, London (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. L. Kusters and O. Peterson. ‘A Transformer Ratio Arm Bridge for High Voltage Capacitance Measurements’. I.E.E.E. Trans. on Communication and Electronics. 82, pt 1, 606–611 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. P. MacMartin and N. L. Kusters. ‘A Direct Current Comparitor Ratio Bridge for 4-terminal Resistance Measurements’. I.E.E.E. Trans. of Instrumentation and Measurement. IM-15 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Sutcliffe. ‘Current Comparitor Bridges and Potentiometers’. Electronic Equipment News (May 1970 )

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. D. Prensky. Electronic Instrumentation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Calvert and J. Mildwater. ‘Self-balancing Transformer Ratio Arm Bridges’. Electronic Engineering. 35, No. 430 (Dec. 1963)

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. Hill and A. P. Miller. ‘An a.c. Double Bridge with Inductively Coupled Ratio Arms for Precision Platinum Resistance Thermometry’. Proc. I.E.E. 110, No. 2 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. H. Silcocks. ‘Revolution in Calibration’. Cambridge Technical Review (May 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. H. Silcocks. ‘Measurement Techniques’. Kent Technical Review (March 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. B. Stout. Basic Electrical Measurements ( 2nd edn. ). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Fletcher. ‘Use of Transformer Ratio Arm Bridges in Component Measurements’. Radio and Electronic Components. 117–123 (Feb. 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Calvert. ‘The Transformer Ratio-Arm Bridge’. Wayne Kerr Monograph No. 1

    Google Scholar 

  16. The General Radio Company. The Experimenter. 39, No. 4 and 40 nos 11,12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 B. A. Gregory

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gregory, B.A. (1973). Comparison Methods. In: An Introduction to Electrical Instrumentation. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01880-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01880-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-01882-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01880-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics