Abstract
The uncertainty of legal proceedings is a notion so generally adopted, and has so long been the standing theme of wit and good humour, that he who should attempt to refute it would be looked upon as a man, who was either incapable of discernment himself, or else meant to impose upon others. Yet it may not be amiss, before we enter upon the several modes whereby certainty is meant to be obtained in our courts of justice, to inquire a little wherein this uncertainty, so frequently complained of, consists; and to what causes it owes it’s original.
Book III, Chapter 22.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1973 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, G. (1973). Of the several species of trial. In: Jones, G. (eds) The Sovereignty of the Law. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01823-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01823-9_17
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-01825-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01823-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)