Skip to main content

Abstract

THIS CHAPTER INVESTIGATES the problems involved in the evaluation of recreational benefits and the methodology which has evolved. Cost-benefit analysis techniques and their applications are also examined and an attempt is made to produce a basis for a realistic approach which is then applied to specific facilities in Nottingham. There are indeed many problems inherent in the quantifying and evaluation of social costs and benefits. The central core of most approaches to the economics of recreation is the distance travelled concept, as the cost of travel to a non-priced facility must give some indication of the value of the use of the resource to the visitor. There is, however, an evident need to refine present techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OUTDOOR RECREATION RESOURCES REVIEW COMMISSION. Economic Studies of Outdoor Recreation. Study report 24, Washington D.C., (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. DAVIS, R. K. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal, 3.2, (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  3. CLAWSON, M. (1963). Land and Water for Recreation, Rand McNally, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  4. ROBINSON, W. C. The simple economics of public outdoor recreation. Land Economics, 43.1, (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ROLPH, E. (1956). Pp. 20–22 in The theory of fiscal economics, University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. WENNERGREN, E. B. Valuing non-market priced recreational resources. Land Economics, 40.3, (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. PEARSE, P. H. A new approach to the evaluation of non-priced recreational resources. Land Economics, 44.1, (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MISHAN, E. J. A survey of welfare economics, 1939–1959. Economic Journal, 70, (June 1960), 197–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. PREST, A. R. and TURVEY, R. Cost-benefit analysis: a survey. Economic Journal, 75, (December 1965), 683–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PETERS, G. H. Cost-benefit Analysis and Public Expenditure: Eaton Paper 8. Institute of Economic Affairs, (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  11. MCKEAN, R. N. (1958). Efficiency in Government through Systems Analysis, John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. ECKSTEIN, O. (1961). A survey of the theory of public expenditure criteria. Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Utilization, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. COBURN, T. M., BEESLEY, M. E. and REYNOLDS, D. J., The London-Birmingham Motorway: Traffic and Economics. Road Research Laboratory Technical Paper 46, H.M.S.O., (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  14. BEESLEY, M. E. and FOSTER, C. D. The Victoria Line: Social benefits and finances. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 128.1, (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LICHFIELD, N. Cost-benefit analysis in town planning: A case study: Swanley. Urban Studies, 3.3, (1966), 215–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LICHFIELD, N., Cost-benefit Analysis in Town Planning: A Case Study of Cambridge. Cambridgeshire County Council, (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  17. LICHFIELD, N. (1965). Spacial externalities in urban public expenditures: A case study, in The Public Economy of Urban Communities (Ed. Margolis, J.), John Hopkins Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  18. LICHFIELD, N. Cost-benefit analysis in urban expansion. A case study: Peterborough. Regional Studies, 3.2, (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  19. INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL TREASURERS AND ACCOUNTANTS, Cost-benefit Analysis, (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  20. HENDER, J. D. Introduction to cost-benefit analysis. Cost-benefit Analysis, Institute of Municipal Treasurers and Accountants, (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  21. WILSON, A. G. The technique of cost-benefit analysis. Cost-benefit Analysis, Institute of Municipal Treasurers and Accountants, (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  22. PESTON, M., Cost-benefit values. Town and Country Planning, (December 1969), 563–565

    Google Scholar 

  23. STOCKS, N. R., Cost-benefit analysis. The Chartered Surveyor, (April 1966), 547–551

    Google Scholar 

  24. RESOURCES FOR TOMORROW CONFERENCE. Water Workshop B Benefit-cost analysis. Proceedings of Resources for Tomorrow Conference, Montreal, (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  25. CRUTCHFIELD, J. A. Valuation of fishery resources. Land Economics, 38.2, (1962), 145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. MACK, R. P. and MYERS, S. (1965). Pp. 71–116 in Outdoor Recreation. Measuring Benefits of Government Investments. (Ed. Dorfman R.), Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  27. TRICE, A. H. and WOOD, S. E., Measurement of recreation benefits. Land Economics, 34.3, (1958), 195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. CLAWSON, M. and KNETSCH, J. L. (1966). Economics of Outdoor Recreation, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  29. KNETSCH, J. L. Economics of including recreation as a purpose of eastern water projects. Journal of Farm Economics, 46.5, (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  30. DAIUTE, R. J. Methods of determination of demand for outdoor recreation. Land Economics, 42.3, (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. PREWITT REPORT. An Economic Study of the Monetary Evaluation of Recreation in the National Parks. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service and Recreational Planning Division, (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  32. CLAWSON, M. Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation. Reprint No. 10, Resources for the Future, Washington, (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  33. KNETSCH, J. L. Outdoor recreation demands and benefits. Land Economics, 39.4, (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. MEREWITZ, L. Recreational benefits of water resource development. Water Resources Research, 2.4, (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. BOYET, W. E. and TOLLEY, G. S. Recreation project based on demand analysis. Journal of Farm Economics, 48.4, (1966), 984–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. WENNERGREN, E. B. Surrogate pricing of outdoor recreation. Land Economics, 43.1, (1967), 112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. WOOD, D. F., The distances-travelled technique for measuring value of recreation areas: an application. Land Economics, 37.4, (1961), 363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. MANSFIELD, N. W., Recreation trip generation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 3.2, (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  39. BURTON, T. L. and WIBBERLEY, G. P. (1965). Outdoor Recreation in the British Countryside, Wye College, University of London

    Google Scholar 

  40. ROAD RESEARCH LABORATORY. (1965). Research on Road Traffic, H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  41. NORTON, G. A. An Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation as a Rural Land-using Activity in North Wales. Private communication, Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  42. AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION. Schedule of Estimated Running Costs. Technical Paper 9, (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  43. RILEY, C. S. Motivational Aspects of Car Use, Ministry of Transport

    Google Scholar 

  44. OUTDOOR RECREATION RESOURCES REVIEW COMMISSION. Outdoor Recreation for America. Report to President and Congress of United States, Washington D.C., (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  45. SECKLER, D. W. On the uses and abuses of economic science in evaluating public outdoor recreation. Land Economics, 42.4, (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. CLAWSON, M. Recreation as a competitive segment of multiple use. Land and Water Use, American Association for the Advancement of Science, (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  47. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. California Public Outdoor Recreation Plan, (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  48. STATE OF OHIO. State Park Survey, Fees and Charges, State of Ohio, Division of Parks, Department of National Resources, Columbus, (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  49. BROOM, E. The great outdoors. Sport and Recreation, 7.4, (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  50. PEPPIATT, W. D. The pricing of sea-side facilities. Essays in the Theory and Practice of Pricing, Institute of Economic Affairs, (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  51. SMITH, R. J. and KAVANAGH, N. J. The Measurement of Benefits of Trout Fishing: Preliminary Results of a Study at Grafham Water, Great Ouse Water Authority; Huntingdonshire. Studies of recreational demand No. 4. Faculty of Commerce and Social Science, University of Birmingham, (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  52. RODGERS, H. B. Leisure and recreation. Urban Studies, 6.3, (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. COUNTRYSIDE COMMISSION. Methods of Charging at Rural Car Parks, (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  54. KNETSCH, J. L. Land values and parks in urban fringe areas. Journal of Farm Economics, 37.4, (1961), 1718–1726

    Google Scholar 

  55. KITCHEN, J. W. and HENDON, W. S. Land values adjacent to an urban neighbourhood park. Land Economics, 42.3, (1967), 357–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION. (1966). Outdoor Recreation Space Standards, NRPA, New York

    Google Scholar 

  57. KNETSCH, J. L. The influence of reservoir projects on land values. Journal of Farm Economics, (February 1964), 231–243

    Google Scholar 

  58. CIRIACY-WANTRUP, S. V. The ‘new’ competition for land and some implications for public policy. Natural Resources Journal, 4.2, (1964), 264–266

    Google Scholar 

  59. NISBET, J. Cost planning in relation to landscape. Journal of Institute of Landscape Architects, (November 1962), 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  60. WILSON, P. M., Marinas: development and economic factors. The Appraisal Journal, (April 1967), 199–222

    Google Scholar 

  61. BRITISH TRAVEL ASSOCIATION/UNIVERSITY OF KEELE, Pilot National Recreation Survey. Report No. 1, (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  62. BURTON, T. L. and FULCHER, M. N. Measurement of recreation benefits—a survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 3.2, (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  63. MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING UNIT, H. M. TREASURY. Seminar on the Treatment of Land, Infrastructure and Amenity in Cost Benefit Studies, Sunningdale, (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  64. GOLF DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL. Elements of Golf Course Layout and Design

    Google Scholar 

  65. SEELEY, I. H. (1967). Municipal Engineering Practice, Macmillan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  66. DEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY INTO ALLOTMENTS. Report: Cmnd. 4166, H.M.S.O., (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  67. BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD. Annual Report and Accounts 1968, H.M.S.O., (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  68. BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD. The Facts about the Waterways, (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  69. HADFIELD, C. (1966). The Canals of the East Midlands, David and Charles

    Google Scholar 

  70. PREST, A. R., and TURVEY, R. Cost-benefit analysis: a survey. Economic Journal, 75, (1965), 683–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. LEWIS, J. P. Mis-used Techniques in Planning: Occasional Paper No. 2—Cost-benefit analysis. University of Manchester, Centre for Urban and Regional Research, (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  72. MANSFIELD, N. W. The estimation of benefits from recreation sites and the provision of a new recreation facility. Regional Studies, 5.2, (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 I. H. Seeley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seeley, I.H. (1973). Economics of Outdoor Recreation. In: Outdoor Recreation and the Urban Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01815-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics