Advertisement

By-Elections of the Second World War

  • Paul Addison

Abstract

The by-elections of 1939–45 were so unlike normal by-elections that at first it is hard to make sense of them. There were no contests between the three main parties. At the outbreak of the war, under the Chamberlain government, the Chief Whips of the Liberal, Labour and Conservative parties concluded an electoral truce whereby, when a seat fell vacant, the party which had held it previously would nominate a candidate, while the other two parties agreed not to do so. The agreement was to last for the duration of the war, or until one of the signatories withdrew. The purpose of the arrangement was to preserve a measure of national unity by confining party differences to the House of Commons. When all three parties joined the Churchill Coalition in May 1940, the truce acquired a deeper significance, as an essential precondition of unity within the government. Hence, although the rank and file of the Labour Party at times grew very restless with an arrangement which protected a Conservative majority of over 200, the truce was never seriously in question. Of the 141 seats which fell vacant during the war, 66 were filled unopposed, by the nominee of the incumbent party.

Keywords

Labour Party Incumbent Party Common Wealth Candidate Safe Seat Common Wealth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    G. L. Reakes, Man of the Mersey (1956) p. 78.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Hadley Cantril, Public Opinion, 1935–1946 (Princeton, 1951) p. 195.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    A. J. P. Taylor, Beaverbrook (1972) pp. 404–6.Google Scholar
  4. 15.
    Ivor Davies, Trial by Ballot (1950) p. 155.Google Scholar
  5. 16.
    Donald Johnson, Bars and Barricades (1952) pp. 240–2.Google Scholar
  6. 18.
    Angus Calder, ‘The Common Wealth Party, 1942–1945’, Ph.D. thesis (Sussex, 1967) part 1, pp. 90–1.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    For Driberg and Maldon, see Tom Driberg, The Best of Both Worlds (1953) pp. 181–5; Mass-Observation boxed material on Maldon; and Calder, op. cit., pp. 93–6.Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    Tom Harrisson, ‘Who’ll Win?’, Political Quarterly, xv (1944) 27.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    Mass-Observation, ‘Social Security and Parliament’, Political Quarterly, XIV (1943) 246.Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    For an excellent survey of reactions to the Report, see Arthur Marwick, Britain in the Century of Total War (1968) pp. 300–14.Google Scholar
  11. 27.
    R. W. Mackay, Coupon or Free? (1943) p. 21.Google Scholar
  12. 29.
    Frank Bealey et al., Constituency Politics (1965) pp. 91–2;Google Scholar
  13. A. H. Birch, Small- Town Politics (Oxford, 1959) p. 61.Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    See the account of the contest in Angus Calder, The People’s War (1969) pp. 552–4. See also Daily Mail, 8 Feb 1944.Google Scholar
  15. 41.
    Kay Allsop, in Common Wealth Review (Mar 1944) p. 9.Google Scholar
  16. 49.
    David Butler, ‘Trends in British By-Elections’, Journal of Politics, xi 2 (1949) 396–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 51.
    Robert Rhodes James (ed.), Chips: The Diaries of Sir Henry Channon (1967) p. 393.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul Addison 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Addison

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations