Abstract
Tracing influences is regarded in many quarters as a disreputable game, and, like many disreputable games, it can rapidly become a pleasurable addiction. The hazards of disentangling the many factors that make a novelist what he is are obvious enough. While a number of the major Realists claimed to be directly indebted to various of the thinkers mentioned below, others had read none of them. Yet they all moved in a society where the intellectual climate, that much maligned term, had been conditioned by them. Like huge savanna trees, their contribution to the atmosphere was diffusive and hard to quantify, but nonetheless far-reaching.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Some book
Aram Vartanian, La Mettrie’s L’Homme Machine. A study in the origins of an idea (Princeton U.P., 1960);
Georges Le Roy, La Psychologic de Condillac (Boivin, 1937);
R. Lefèvre, Condillac, ou la joie de vivre (Seghers, 1966);
D. W. Smith, Helvétius. A Study in Persecution (Clarendon P., 1965).
Fernand Rude, Stendhal et la pensée sociale de son temps (Plon. 1967)
E. Novak, Defoe and the Nature of Man (O.U.P., 1963 )
Copyright information
© 1977 Maurice Larkin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larkin, M. (1977). Determinist Thought: Stendhal and the Eighteenth-century Inheritance. In: Man and Society in Nineteenth-Century Realism. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01661-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01661-7_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-01663-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01661-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)