Advertisement

Abstract

With the fall of Smuts from power in 1948 — and great was the fall thereof — the failure of South Africa’s formal expansion into the High Commission Territories was final in the sense that no British government thereafter would lift a finger to further it. In Britain Labour gave way to Conservative in 1951, but it made no difference. Agreement about the transfer question, declared prime minister Winston Churchill, was so widespread that there was no point in debating it in parliament.1 Despite appearances, which were carefully nurtured, British policy was not simply stagnating on the issue. Continued refusal to transfer the Territories had a more positive dimension. More than pure procrastination, it was in a sense congruent with a reassertion of the imperial factor in East and Central Africa from 1945. In a world becoming increasingly uncomfortable for Britain, Dr Malan was more of a bogeyman than Dr Nkrumah.

Keywords

Prime Minister British Government National Party Rugby Union High Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    PD/C. 526/968, 13 Apr 54.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Oxford History of South Africa, II, ch. by J. E. Spence, 492.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. C. Smuts, jnr, Jan Christian Smuts (1952), 266–7, 344.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Fortune, M.C.C. in South Africa 1964–65 (1965) 13 (I owe this reference to Mr G. W. Martin).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walker, A history of Southern Africa, 759; Marquard, The peoples and policies of South Africa, 220–25.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benson, Tshekedi Khama, ch. 13.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marquard, A Federation of Southern Africa, 46–48, 58.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker, 910.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Mansergh (ed.), Documents and speeches on British Commonwealth Affairs 1931–52 (1953), ii, 928–9. British missionary concern is indicated in R. P. Orchard, The High Commission Territories [1952] pamphlet, legal in R. C. Fitzgerald, ‘South Africa and the High Commission Ter’Teritories’ (World Affairs, n.s. IV, 1950, 306–20).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    HAD. 85/3776 (12 Apr 54) & 3964–5 (13 Apr); PD/C. 494/559–60.Google Scholar
  11. Walker, 853.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    LGA.: S. 3/20/1/46 (1953).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    LGA.: S. 3/20/0/50 (1958).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    HAD. 85/3769–3971: 12, 13 & 14 Apr 54 — for Malan’s opening and closing speeches see 3769–84, 3959–71; PD/C. 526/966–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tshekedi Khama, Bechuanaland and South Africa (African Bureau pamphlet, 1955, with a foreword by M. Perham).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    PD/C. 556/195.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Round Table, XL (1950) 121–6, XLI (1951) 224–5, XLII (1951) 90–4 & (1952) 141–51; Perham, Colonial Sequence, I, 327.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    HAD. 87/715–16, 8 Feb 55 & 99/4000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Summary of the Report of the Commission for the Socio-Economic development of the Bantu Areas within the Union of South Africa (Government Printer Pretoria, U.G. 61/1955).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    HAD. 91/5360.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    See Summary of the Report … especially 105, 180–3, 207–11.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    HAD. 91/5366–76, 14 May 56.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marquard, A Federation of Southern Africa. Note particularly 34, 70, 135–9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Heaton Nicholls, South Africa in my time, 478–81. The author was Smuts’ wartime choice for the post of the Union’s high commissioner in London.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benson, 285; Cmd. 9580 (H.M.S.O. 1955), 19 pp.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Southern Africa in transition (ed. Davis & Baker), ch. by D. V. Cowen, 91.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Summary of the Report … 210.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hailey, The Republic of South Africa and the High Commission Territories, 107–8; Marquard, A Federation, 48, 59.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. S. Munger, Bechuanaland: Pan-African Outpost or Bantu Homeland? (1965), passim; P. Giniewski, Bantustans:a trek towards the future (Cape Town, 1961) 180; Marquard, A Federation, 55.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spence, Lesotho:Politics of independence, 75–8; Round Table, liv (1963) 105–6; see also D. Austin, ‘White Power?’ (Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, vi (1968) 95–506) for some interesting speculations.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Halpern, South Africa’s Hostages:Basutoland, Bechuanaland and Swaziland (1965) gives a detailed account of all these matters.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cowen in Southern Africa in transition, 91.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marquard, The peoples and policies of South Africa: in the 1960 edition, ch. 10 on South-West Africa and the High Commission Territories is headed ‘The Union’s “Colonies”’; in the 1969 edition it has been renamed ‘The Republic’s Neighbours’.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ronald Hyam 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Hyam

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations