Advertisement

Design Aspects of Endo-Prostheses for the Lower Limb

  • John P. Paul

Abstract

In current clinical practice hip arthroplasty devices are being fitted to patients of progressively younger age groups (Charnley, 1971). Considerable research has been undertaken into the friction and wear characteristics required of the bearing surfaces of joint replacements (Duff Barclay, 1967; Scales, 1969). Attention has been directed principally to the design of the acetabular component of the hip joint and problems of attachment of this to the pelvic structure. There has been little research or analysis of the interface between the prosthesis and the femur, largely because clinically this region rarely gives rise to problems. The form of the femoral component of the prosthesis is generally a curved intramedullary stem of approximately rectangular cross-section secured either with bone chips or methyl methacrylate cement, a typical average design of stem being shown in figure 1.

Keywords

Femoral Component Acetabular Component Load Action Knee Prosthesis Heel Strike 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carlsen, C. 1970: Experimental measurement of pressure distribution on the human hip joint. SESA Spring Meeting, Huntsville, Alabama, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  2. Charnley, J. 1971: The present status of total hip replacement. Internal Publication No. 30. Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital.Google Scholar
  3. Condie, D. N. 1973: Biomechanics of the ankle joint. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland (in preparation).Google Scholar
  4. DuffBarclay, I., and Spillman, D. T. 1967: Total human hip joint prostheses—a laboratory study of friction and wear. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 181: 3J: 90.Google Scholar
  5. Gembicki, F. W., Frankel, V. H., and Burstein, A. H. 1970: AM/FM telemetry of load on a femoral lead fixation appliance. Internal report. Biomechanics Laboratory, Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
  6. Harper, F. C., Warlow, W. J., and Clarke, B. L. 1961: The forces applied to the floor by the foot in walking National Building Studies Research Paper 32. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
  7. Inman, V. T. 1947 : Functional aspects of the abductor muscles of the hip. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 39 (3) 607.Google Scholar
  8. Kummer, B. 1972: Biomechanics of bone. In `Biomechanics: its Foundations and Objectives’ (Ed. Y. C. Fung). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  9. Morrison, J. B. 1967: The forces transmitted by the human knee joint during activity. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
  10. Morrison, J. B. 1968: Bioengineering analysis of force actions transmitted by the knee joint. Bio-Med. Eng. 3: 4: 164.Google Scholar
  11. Paul, J. P. 1967a: Forces transmitted by joints in the human body. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 181 (3J): 8.Google Scholar
  12. Paul, J. P. 1967b: Forces at the human hip joint. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
  13. Rydell, N. W. 1966: Forces acting on the femoral head prosthesis. Acta. Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 88 37: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scales, J. T., Kelly, P., and Goddard, D. 1969: Friction torque studies of total joint replacements—the use of a simulator. In `Lubrication and Wear in Joints’ (Ed. V. Wright ). Sector, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bioengineering Unit, University of Strathclyde 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Paul
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StrathclydeGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations