Commercial Organisation and Markets

  • S. D. Chapman
Part of the Studies in Economic History book series


ALL the raw material used in the cotton industry was imported, and an organisation had to be evolved to supply the manufacturers with increasing quantities of raw cotton (or cotton wool, as it was generally known). From the early 1780s merchants and manufacturers recognised that further growth depended on increased supplies of cotton at low prices, particularly the finer qualities, and they were not slow to press their views with the Board of Trade and the planters. However, projects to increase the cotton crop in the West Indies (especially the Bahamas) and introduce the commodity into Sierra Leone met with only a limited response. The East India Company was reluctant to export the finer Indian staples as it was anxious to maintain its trade in Indian muslins, which depended on a restricted supply. The most encouraging response at first came from Brazil, where the crop was encouraged by the Portuguese Government, but this source was quickly superseded in the 1790s by the rapid expansion of cotton in the southern plantations of the recently established United States of America. In the early 1790s the profits on the cotton crop were high, and quickly displaced other cash crops, such as rice, indigo and tobacco.


Cotton Wool Cotton Crop Cotton Yarn East India Company Commission Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 51.
    D. M. Williams, ‘Liverpool Merchants and the Cotton Trade, 1820–1850’, in J. R. Harris (ed.), Liverpool and Merseyside (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 52.
    C. H. Lee, ‘Marketing Organisation and Policy in the Cotton Trade: M’Connel amp; Kennedy’, Business History x (1968); Fitton and Wadsworth, The Strutts and the Arkwrights chap. 11; Edwards, The British Cotton Trade chap. 7.Google Scholar
  3. 53.
    Edwards, The British Cotton Trade pp. 172–4; R. Smith, ‘Manchester as a Centre for Manufacturing and Merchanting of Cotton Goods, 1820–30’, University of Birmingham Historical Journal w (1953–4).Google Scholar
  4. 56.
    Lévy-Leboyer, Les Banques Européennes pp. 510–16; S. Pollard and C. Holmes, Documents of European Economic History, z (1968) 285–94.Google Scholar
  5. 57.
    N. S. Buck, Development of the Organisation of the Anglo-American Trade, 1800–1850 (1925) chaps. 5–8; Edwards, The British Cotton Trade, pp. 89–97; Chapman, ‘James Longsdon’, pp. 274–5.Google Scholar
  6. 58.
    A. Slaven, ‘A Glasgow Firm in the Indian Market: John Lean & Sons, Muslin Weavers’, Business History Review, xLIII (1969).Google Scholar
  7. 59.
    C. Fohlen, L’Industrie Textile au Temps du Second Empire (Paris, 1956) pp. 148–9; James Finlay & Co. Ltd, 1750–1950 (Glasgow, 1951) pp. 7, 15, 18; C. H. Lee, A Cotton Enterprise, 1795–1840: A History of M’Connel & Kennedy, Fine Cotton Spinners (Manchester, 1972) chap. 4.Google Scholar
  8. 60.
    Edwards, The British Cotton Trade chap. 4; A. Imlah, Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica (Cambridge, Mass., 1958) esp. pp. 103–7.Google Scholar
  9. 61.
    Ellison, The Cotton Trade of Great Britain pp. 63–4; L. G. Sandberg, ‘Movements in the Quality of British Cotton Textile Exports’, Journal of Economic History xxvni (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Economic History Society 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. D. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations