Abstract
IN ENGLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY “the idea of a Protestant foreign policy” may be referred to the concept of Oliver Cromwell’s diplomacy as being inspired more by religious than by commercial or geopolitical considerations. As such it implies condemnation. With the eccentric exception of Carlyle, historians writing since the middle part of the nineteenth century have called Cromwell’s foreign policy Protestant principally as an aid to pointing out, and explaining, its deficiencies. This interpretation has had for its theme that Cromwell’s view of the European situation was anachronistically orientated toward that of Elizabeth’s day, or at least of the Thirty Years’ War, when religious antipathies were more relevant to national interests. In consequence the words “Elizabethan” and “anachronistic” have been used here as virtual synonyms for “Protestant.” Gardiner made the identification explicitly: “His mind still worked on the lines of the Elizabethan period, when the championship of Protestantism was imposed on Englishmen by interest as well as by duty.”1 The idea is that Cromwell, pursuing this “chimera,”2 was led to neglect real problems, such as the trade rivalry of the Dutch and the danger of French domination of the Continent, for involvement in a Spanish war destructive of English commerce, and an alliance with France detrimental to the balance of power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
S. R. Gardiner, History of the Commonwealth and Protectorate (1903), II, 188.
T. Carlyle, Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell (1888 ed.), Speech VIII, April 1657.
An odd exception is F. Harrison, Oliver Cromwell (1899), who regarded it as a justified attempt to secure the “free commerce of the ocean.”
J. Buchan, Oliver Cromwell (1934), p. 413.
S. R. Gardiner, Oliver Cromwell (1962 ed.), p. 168.
C. H. Firth (ed.), Clarke Papers (1899), III, 52. Army newsletter, September 1655. Bordeaux to Mazarin, April 8 and 29, 1655, quoted in Gardiner, op. cit., III, 390. Other references to warnings include TSP, III, 637, IV, 21, 47, and Correspondance de la Cour d’Espagne, IV, 497.
C. H. Firth (ed.), Ludlow Memoirs (1894), II, 2–3.
Bolingbroke, Letters on the Study and Use of History (1752), I, 258–59.
D. A. Bigby, Anglo-French Relations 1641–1649 (1933), p. 31.
Clarendon, History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England (1958 cd.), IX, s. 170.
Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, Commonwealth, and Protectorate Series (hereafter CSPD), XI, 245, Petition of Richard Baker 1657 (?)—1,800. Burton’s Diary (1828), III, 402, Bampfield; February 1659–1,500. Ibid., IV, 364, Hesilrige; April 1659—at least 1,200. TSP, VII, 662, Barwick to Hyde; April 1659—over 1,200. Harleian Miscellany, VII, 103, Royalist; 1660—over 2,000. Ibid., VII, 229, Royalist; 1661–1,200. Ibid., VII, 353, Slingsby Bethel; 1668–1,500. Anchitel Gray, Debates of the House of Commons (1769), II, 213, Garroway; 1673–1,600.
J. S. Bromley, “The French Privateering War,” in Historical Essays presented to David Ogg (1963), p. 214.
F. Guizot, History of Richard Cromwell (London, 1856 ed.), I, 234–35.
M. Ashley, Financial and Commercial Policy under the Cromwellian Protectorate (1962 ed.), 143–44, argues for Bordeaux’s objectivity on this point.
TSP, V, 165. Quoted by Christopher Hill, The Century of Revolution (1961), p. 158.
The list is from B. E. Supple, Commercial Crisis and Change in England 1600–1642 (1959).
Vide TSP, VII, 516. Instructions to Downing c. November 1658. Also Bischoffshausen, Die Politik des Oliver Cromwell (Innsbruck, 1899), 198, for mention in one of the drafts Thurloe made for Clarendon at the Restoration (B.M. Stowe MS. 185, ff. 187–200).
It would be impracticable to give even a representative selection of references for Cromwell’s religious views as he expressed them. For outward dispensations see Carlyle, op. cit., Letters LXVII, LXX, LXXIII, LXXXV, CXLVIII, etc.; W. C. Abbott, The Writings and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell (1937), I, 719, II, 82, etc. For fatalism especially frequent references. Freedom of will is implicit in Cromwell’s appeals to the Dutch and Scots to repent seeing God’s hand against them, and elsewhere. I have attempted to synthesize these elements, believing that Cromwell was a deeply introverted man (as his scanty medical history suggests) and must himself have tried to reconcile these different aspects of his belief.
The idea was commonly perverted into one of killing two birds with one stone. Examples in M. James, Social Problems and Policy during the Puritan Revolution (1930), pp. 22–23. Thomas Gage on the English-American (v. him also in TSP, III, 59) was a particularly cynical exponent.
P. Meadowes, A Narrative of the Principal Actions Occurring in the Wars betwixt Sweden and Denmark (1677).
CSPD, III, 273–74, July 1650, 1651; 392, September 1651; TSP, V, 88, June 1656, for complaints of Polish and Danzig exactions. For the Eastland Company’s policy, see R. W. K. Hinton, The Eastland Trade and the Common Weal in the Seventeenth Century (1959), pp. 126–28.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1973 Ivan Roots
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crabtree, R. (1973). The Idea of a Protestant Foreign Policy. In: Roots, I. (eds) Cromwell. World Profiles. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01479-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01479-8_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-01481-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01479-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)