The Theory of Effective Protection
Why do countries impose tariffs? The main objective of the tariff-imposing country, apart from curbing imports and possibly capturing the advantage of its natural monopoly power in trade, is to encourage the domestic production of the import-competing industries whose survival is threatened by foreign competition. Until recently, the protective effects of a tariff on the imports of a final good were taken for granted. It was generally believed that a higher rate of tariff or a higher nominal rate of protection would lead to a higher output level for the protected commodity. With the recognition by trade theorists of the importance of trade in intermediate goods, a new measure of protection, widely known as the effective rate of protection (E.R.P.), has been evolved to take into account the implications of the entire tariff structure, rather than tariffs on individual imported commodities, for the pattern of output in the economy. In contrast to the theory of nominal protection, which analyses the impact of tariffs on the total value of final goods, the E.R.P. measures the percentage change in the contribution of the domestic primary factors or, what is the same thing, in the value-added of an industry as the economy moves from a free trade situation to one of protected trade.
KeywordsIncome Expense Dition Librium Allo
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Balassa, B., ‘Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation’, Journal of Political Economy lxxiii (Dec 1965) 572–94.Google Scholar
- Casas, F. R., ‘Optimal Effective Protection in General Equilibrium’, American Economic Review, lxiii (Sep 1973).Google Scholar
- Corden, W. M., ‘The Substitution Problem in the Theory of Effective Protection’, Journal of International Economics, i (Feb 1971) 37–58.Google Scholar
- Ellsworth, P. T., ‘Import Substitution in Pakistan: Some Comments’, Pakistan Development Review, vi (autumn 1966) 395–407.Google Scholar
- Johnson, H. G., ‘The Theory of Tariff Structure with Special Reference to World Trade and Development’, in Trade and Development ( Geneva: Institut Universitaire des Hautes Études Internationales, 1965 ).Google Scholar
- Leith, J. C.,‘The Effects of Tariffs on Production, Consumption and Trade: A Revised Analysis’, American Economic Review, lxi (Mar 1971) 74–81.Google Scholar
- Ramaswami, V. K., and Srinivasan, T. N., ‘Tariff Structure and Resource Allocation in the Presence of Factor Substitution’, in J. N. Bhagwati et al. (eds.), Trade, Balance of Payments, and Growth (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971)Google Scholar
- Ruffin, R. J., ‘Tariffs, Intermediate Goods, and Domestic Protection’, American Economic Review, lix (June 1969) 261–9.Google Scholar
- Ruffin, R. J., ‘The Welfare Implications of Effective Protection’, in H. G. Grubel and H. G. Johnson (eds.), Effective Tariff Protection (Geneva: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Graduate Institute of International Studies, 1971) chap. 5.Google Scholar