Intermediate Products: The Inter-Industry Flows

  • Raveendra N. Batra


Until now we have assumed that goods are produced with the help of primary factors only, but since in practice much of the production activity would come to a halt if there were no intermediate products — goods which are produced to be used as inputs in other goods — this assumption, although a convenient one, is very unrealistic. There is hardly any justification for this assumption, even though the bulk of trade theory has ignored the presence of material inputs which constitute a very large proportion of the total volume of world trade.† It is only recently that trade theorists have come to recognise the importance of intermediate products in the production process, but even here the general tendency has been to defend the neglect of the treatment of material inputs in the earlier literature. In his book on trade theory, for example, Kemp ([7], p. 148), citing Vanek [10], defends the neglect of the incorporation of intermediate goods in earlier trade theory. In some respect, this neglect may be justified. Many properties of the general equilibrium model presented in the previous chapters carry over to the model with intermediate goods. However, there are some crucial differences which have not been recognised before. The analysis of such similarities and differences is the subject-matter of this chapter.


International Trade Intermediate Product Intermediate Good Material Input Price Ratio 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Allen, R. G. D., Mathematical Analysis for Economists ( London: Macmillan, 1938 ).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Batra, R. N., and Pattanaik, P. K., ‘Economic Growth, Intermediate Products, and the Terms of Trade’, Canadian Journal of Economics, iv (May 1971) 225–37.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Casas, F. R., ‘The Theory of Intermediate Products, Technical Change and Growth’, Journal of International Economics, (May 1972).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chipman, J. S. ‘A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 3, The Modern Theory’, Econometrica, xxxiv (Jan 1966) 18–76.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ethier, W., ‘Input Substitution and the Concept of the Effective Rate of Protection’, Journal of Political Economy, lxxx (Jan–Feb 1972 ) 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Guisinger, S. E., ‘Negative Value Added and the Theory of Effective Protection’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, lxxxiii (Aug 1969) 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kemp, M. C., The Pure Theory of International Trade and Investment (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1969) chap. 7.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    McKinnon, R. I., ‘Intermediate Products and Differential Tariffs: A Generalization of Lerner’s Symmetry Theorem’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Lxxx (Nov 1966) 584–615.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Melvin, J. R., ‘Intermediate Goods, the Production Possibility Curve, and the Gains from Trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, lxxxiii (Feb 1969) 141–51.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Vanek, J., ‘Variable Factor Proportions and Inter-Industry Flows in the Theory of International Trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, lxxvii (Feb 1963) 129–42.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Yates, P. L., Forty Years of Foreign Trade ( London: Allen & Unwin, 1959 ).Google Scholar

Supplementary Reading

  1. [12]
    Warne, R. D., ‘Intermediate Goods in International Trade with Variable Proportions and Two Primary Inputs’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, lxxxv (May 1971) 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Raveendra N. Batra 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raveendra N. Batra

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations