Factor Market Imperfections

  • Raveendra N. Batra


There is a general agreement among economists that perfect competition is a ‘myth’. Yet the bulk of the analysis in trade theory — and economic theory in general — has been carried out under this ‘mythical’ assumption. Perhaps the best case that can be made for a perfect market is that it provides an ‘ideal’ yardstick to evaluate the efficiency of existing systems which generally fail to satisfy the stringent requirements of competitive conditions. This suggests that the assumption of perfect markets, which up to the previous chapter contributed much to the simplicity of our analysis, stands in need of replacement. Relaxing this assumption in turn permits a wide variety of production systems such as monopoly, oligopoly, imperfect factor markets, etc., all of which, individually or collectively, may characterise the production side of a country. In order to bring the analysis down to manageable proportions, some selectivity in the choice of alternative systems is unavoidable. In this chapter we relax the assumption of perfect factor markets, while product markets continue to be perfect. The discussion of the product market distortions is postponed until the next chapter.


Factor Intensity International Trade Free Trade Relative Price Wage Differential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Batra, R. N., and Pattanaik, P. K., ‘Factor Market Imperfections and Gains from Trade’, Oxford Economic Papers, xxiii (July 1971) 182–8.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Batra, R. N., and Scully, G. W., ‘The Theory of. Wage Differentials: Welfare and Im-miserizing Growth’, Journal of International Economics, i (May 1971) 241–7.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bhagwati, J. N., ‘Distortions and Immiserizing Growth: A Generalization’, Review of Economic Studies, xxxv (Oct 1968) 481–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bhagwati, J. N., and Ramaswami, V. K., ‘Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy’, Journal of Political Economy, Lxxi (Feb 1963) 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bhagwati, J. N., and Srinivasan, T. N., ‘The Theory of Wage Differentials: Production Response and Factor Price Equalization,’ Journal of International Economics, 1 (Feb 1971) 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Haberler, G., ‘Some problems in the Pure Theory of International Trade’, Economic Journal, Lx (June 1950) 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Harberger, A. C., ‘The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax’, Journal of Political Economy, LXX (June 1962) 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Herberg, H., and Kemp, M. C., ‘Factor Market Distortions, the Shape of the Locus of Competitive Outputs, and the Relation between Product Prices and Equilibrium Outputs’, in J. N. Bhagwati et al (eds.), Trade, Balance of Payments, and Growth ( Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Herberg, H., and Magee, S. P., ‘Factor Market Distortions, the Reversal of Relative Factor Intensities, and the Relation between Product Prices and Equilibrium Outputs’, mimeographed (1970).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Johnson, H. G., ‘Factor Market Distortions and the Shape of the Transformation Curve’, Econometrica, xxxly (July 1966) 686–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Johnson, H. G., ‘Optimal Trade Intervention in the Presence of Domestic Distortions’, in Trade, Growth and the Balance of Payments ( Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965 ).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Johnson, H. G., ‘A Note on Distortions and the Rate of Growth of an Open Economy’, Economic Journal, Lxxx (Dec 1970).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Jones, R. W., ‘The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models’, Journal of Political Economy, LxxII (Dec 1965) 557–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Lewis, W. A., ‘Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour’, Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, xxll (May 1954) 139–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Magee, S. P., ‘Factor Market Distortions, Production, Distribution and the Pure Theory of International Trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Lxxxv (Nov 1971) 623–43Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs, Relative Prices of Exports and Imports of Underdeveloped Countries (1949).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Batra, R. N., and Pattanaik, P. K., ‘Domestic Distortions and the Gains from Trade’, Economic Journal, LXXX (Sep 1970) 638–49.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Batra, R. N., and Pattanaik, P. K., ‘Factor Market Imperfections, the Terms of Trade, and Wel-fare’, American Economic Review, Lxi (Dec 1971) 946–55.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Batra, R. N., and Casas, F. R., ‘Factor Market Distortions and the Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth’, Canadian Journal of Economics, iv (Nov 1971) 524–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hagen, E. E., ‘An Economic Justification of Protectionism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXII (Nov 1958) 496–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Magee, S. P., ‘Factor Market Distortions, Production and Trade: A Survey’, Oxford Economic Papers (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Pearce, I. F., ‘The Theory of Wage Differentials: The n x n Case’, Journal of International Economics, 1 (May 1971) 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Raveendra N. Batra 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raveendra N. Batra

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations