Skip to main content

On Whether ‘God’ is a Proper Name

  • Chapter
  • 17 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Studies in the Philosophy of Religion ((NSPR))

Abstract

I shall first investigate whether ‘God’ is a proper name, for if the answer to this question is in the affirmative then sentences of the form ‘God is F’ can be said to express propositions of a subject-predicate type, for whilst it is not a necessary condition of an expression being able to occur as a logical subject, introducing a subject of predication, that such an expression is a proper name, it is a sufficient condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  • Cf. P. T. Geach, ‘Good and Evil’, Analysis vol. 17 (1956) pp. 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. E. M. Anscombe and P. T. Geach, Three Philosophers (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1961) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. T. Geach, Reference and Generality ( Cornell University Press, New York, 1962 ) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. E. M. Anscombe, An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. (Hutchinson University Library, London, 1959) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • See ‘On Denoting’ reprinted in R. C. Marsh (ed.), Bertrand Russell — Logic and Knowledge (George Allen & Unwin, London, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • In Basil Mitchell (ed.), Faith and Logic (George Allen & Unwin, London, 1957) pp. 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cf. also H. H. Farmer, Towards Belief in God (S.C.M., Press, London 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cf. H. H. Farmer Revelation and Religion (James Nisbet & Co., Welwyn, 1954);

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Bubert I and Thou (T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1937);

    Google Scholar 

  • Emil Brunner The Divine — Human Encounter (S.C.M. Press, London, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Blackwell, Oxford, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cf. Norman Malcolm, ‘Anselm’s Ontological Arguments’, reprinted in D. Z. Phillips (ed.) Religion and Understanding (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1967) p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cf. G. Frege, Foundations of Arithmetic, p. 59; also ‘On Concept and Object’ in P. Geach and M. Black, Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1952) pp. 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rhees, Without Answers (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1969) pp. 128–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Blakey, Intermediate Pure Mathematics (Cleaver-Hume Press, London, 1953) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 Michael Durrant

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durrant, M. (1973). On Whether ‘God’ is a Proper Name. In: The Logical Status of ‘God’. New Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01412-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics