Skip to main content

The Politics of Collective Choice

  • Chapter
Public Expenditure

Part of the book series: Aldine Treatises in Modern Economics ((MSE))

  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

The framework for public expenditure decisions explored in Chapters 2 to 4 is grounded on individualistic assumptions. The satisfaction of social wants, in this approach, must rest on the preferences of sovereign consumers. Optimality for the public sector is conceived of in terms of conformity with individual preferences in a manner strictly analogous to the conformity with preferences that defines Pareto optimality in the private sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bauer, Raymond A., Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis A. Dexter. American Business and Public Policy. New York: Aldine • Atherton, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke, David, and Charles E. Lindblom, A Strategy of Decision. New York: The Free Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. Fiscal Theory and Political Economy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. Public Finance in Democratic Process. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colm, Gerhard. Essays in Public Finance and Fiscal Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1955, esp. pp. 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colm, Gerhard. “Comments on Samuelson’s Theory of Public Finance.” Review of Economics and Statistics November 1956, pp. 408–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colm, Gerhard. “National Goals Analysis and Marginal Utility Economics.” Finanzarchiv July 1965, pp. 209–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colm, Gerhard. “The Public Interest: Essential Key to Public Policy,” in Friedrich, ed., The Public Interest pp. 115–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, Jan. “The Economic Theory of Socialism: A Suggestion for Reconsideration.” The Journal of Political Economy August 1961, pp. 341–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Yehezkel. “Muddling Through — ‘Science’ or Inertia?” Public Administration Review September 1964, pp. 153–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Yehezkel. Public Policymaking Reexamined. San Francisco: Chandler, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. “The Current Meaning of ‘Behavioralism’ in Political Science,” in James C. Charlesworth, ed., The Limits of Behavioralism in Political Science. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1962, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Carl J., ed., The Public Interest. New York: Aldine • Atherton, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, E. Pendleton. Public Administration and the Public Interest. New York: McGraw Hill, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kariel, Henry S. The Decline of American Pluralism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O., Jr. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Earl. The Group Basis of Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. “The Science of Muddling Through.” Public Administration Review. Spring 1959, pp. 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. “The Handling of Norms in Policy Analysis,” in Moses Abramovitz, ed., The Allocation of Economic Resources. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959a, pp. 160–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. “Decision-Making in Taxation and Expenditures,” in Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Utilization. Princeton: National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton University Press, 1961, pp. 296–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: The Free Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore. “The Public Philosophy: Interest-Group Liberalism.” American Political Science Review March 1967, pp. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Julius. “A Comment on the Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1955, pp. 347–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Julius. “Shadow Prices for Incorrect or Nonexistent Market Values,” in Robert H. Haveman and Julius Margolis, eds., Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis. Chicago: Markham, 1970, pp. 314–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Grant. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Knopf, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, Richard A. The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw Hill, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur, Jr. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Douglas. “Theories of the Public Interest.” in Lynton K. Caldwell, ed., Politics and Public Affairs. Bloomington, Ind: Institute of Training for Public Service, Indiana University, 1962, pp. 141–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, Emmette S. Administration of National Economic Control. New York: Macmillan, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, Glendon A. “ ‘The Public Interest’ in Administrative Decision-Making: Theorem, Theosophy, or Theory?” American Political Science Review June 1957, pp. 346 –68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, Glendon A. The Public Interest: A Critique of the Theory of a Political Concept. New York: The Free Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, Glendon A. “Is There a Public Interest Theory?” in Friedrich, ed., The Public Interest pp. 162–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, Frank J. “The Public Interest Reconsidered.” Journal of Politics, November 1957, pp. 616–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Peter O. Public Expenditure Budgeting. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1969. An excellent summary is contained in Peter O. Steiner, “The Public Sector and the Public Interest,” in Robert H. Haveman and Julius Margolis, eds., Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis. Chicago: Markham, 1970, pp. 21— 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, Knut. “A New Principle of Just Taxation,” in Richard A. Musgrave and Alan T. Peacock, eds., Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Macmillan, 1964, pp. 72–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, Aaron. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little, Brown, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. “The Economy of Patronage.”Journal of Political Economy August 1961, pp. 369–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1971 Jesse Burkhead and Jerry Miner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burkhead, J., Miner, J. (1971). The Politics of Collective Choice. In: Public Expenditure. Aldine Treatises in Modern Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01372-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics