Power and Influence
Since interstate relations involve the distribution, creation, and destruction of such common values as security and wealth, governments are often eager to exercise power and influence and are, in turn, subject to the power and influence of other governments. The academic literature on “power” and “influence” is in a deplorable state of confusion and disagreement. Yet the usefulness of these terms is measured by a clear conception of what power and influence mean, of the conditions under which they will be wielded, and of the consequences of their employment. To promote such clarity is the purpose of this chapter.
KeywordsGoal Achievement Economic Power Military Power Coercive Power Putative Power
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Carl J. Friedrich, Man and His Government ( New York: McGraw Hill, 1963 ), p. 168.Google Scholar
- 3.Robert A. Dahl, “Power,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 12 ( New York: Macmillan, 1968 ), pp. 412–413.Google Scholar
- 4.J. Harsânyi, “Measurement of Social Power,” Game Theory and Related Approaches to Social Behavior, ed. Martin Shubik ( New York: Wiley, 1964 ), pp. 186–188.Google Scholar
- 5.Harold D. Lasswell and Abraham Kaplan, Power and Society ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950 ), p. 266.Google Scholar
- 6.Kenneth E. Boulding, Conflict and Defense, A General Theory ( New York: Harper, 1962 ), p. 323.Google Scholar
- 8.Boulding, Conflict and Defense, p. 254; Thomas C. Schelling, Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), chap. II.Google Scholar
- 9.Cf. Robert L. Rothstein, Alliances and Small Powers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968), esp. chap. I.Google Scholar
- 10.Gerald Garvey,“The Political Economy of Patronal Group,” Public Choice I (Winter 1970): 34.Google Scholar