Skip to main content

Representation and Conceptual Change

  • Chapter
  • 23 Accesses

Part of the book series: Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures ((RIPL))

Abstract

This paper1 suffers from a disconcerting generality. I need an excuse for wandering from Wittgenstein’s Tractatus to Picasso’s drawing of a Weeping Woman, via the philosophy of science and the theory of sense data. The thesis of the paper is that I have such an excuse. These are all areas where the concept of representation either exists in its own right, or has been found to be illuminating by philosophers. An important question is whether it could be the same concept in all these cases. I wish to claim that there is an illuminating common concept, even though to find it may require some fairly drastic modifications of some of the philosophical theses that are involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 The Royal Institute of Philosophy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrison, A. (1973). Representation and Conceptual Change. In: Philosophy and the Arts. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01342-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics