Parties, Politicians and Power

  • W. H. Parker


The representative and elective institutions provided for in the constitutions of each country would not work without political parties to activate them. Candidates have to be nominated; issues have to be formulated and policies elaborated; information or propaganda about these issues and policies has to be disseminated; sufficient interest has to be aroused among the electorate to bring people to the polling booths. The initiative in all this is provided by political parties. In any large nation there are groups and sectional interests too diverse and numerous to enter the political arena individually. Instead they act through parties staffed by professional politicians and which aim to represent as wide a range of such groups as they can. In this respect the most obvious point of contrast between the USA and the USSR is that the former is a two-party state, the latter a one-party state. The various groups and interests that seek to influence government and policy have a choice in America between the Democrat and Republican parties, but in Russia they must act through the Communist party. It follows that in America there is competition for power between the two parties, whereas in Russia the Communist party has a monopoly of it.


Public Opinion Political Party Communist Party American Politician Party System 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Quoted in C. P. Magrath, E. E. Cornwell and J.S. Goodman, The American Democracy (London, 1969) p. 260.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    R. Conquest, The Soviet Political System (New York, 1968) p. 75.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Z. Brzezinski and S. P. Huntington, Political Power: USA/USSR (New York, 1964) p. 241.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    V. O. Key, Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups, 5th ed (New York, 1964) p. 357.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    M. D. Irish and J. W. Prothero, The Politics of American Democracy, 3rd ed. (Englewood Cliffs, 1965) p. 313.Google Scholar
  6. 19.
    E. Mazo and S. Hess, Nixon: A Political Portrait (New York, 1968) p. 59.Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    Irish and Prothero, pp. 208–9; K. Lawson, Political Parties and Democracy in the United States (New York, 1968) pp. 125–6; Magrath, Cornwell and Goodman, p. 228; Key, p. 167.Google Scholar
  8. 26.
    C. Wright Mills, The Power Élite (New York, 1956) p. 124.Google Scholar
  9. 28.
    Key, pp. 83–4; V. Perlo, Militarism and Industry (New York, 1963) p. 160.Google Scholar
  10. 46.
    Mills, p. 170; G. W. Domhoff and H. B. Ballard, C. Wright Mills and the Power Élite (Boston, 1968) p. 55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© W. H. Parker 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. H. Parker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations