Skip to main content

Global Position and International Relations

  • Chapter
The Superpowers

Abstract

The fundamental contrast between the two superpowers derives from the disposition of land and sea over the surface of the globe. If Wegener’s convincing hypothesis is true, the land originally formed a single mass, the outer parts of which have drifted away to form the separate continents.1 They are still close enough together, however, for it to be possible to divide the globe into two halves in such a way that one half is covered almost entirely by sea, while the other contains most of the land. This land hemisphere consists of one large unbroken central area and a surrounding zone of peninsulas and islands, some small and some of continental size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. Wegener, The Origins of Continents and Oceans, trans. J. Biram, introd. B. C. King (London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. J. Mackinder, Democratic Ideals and Reality (London, 1919).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. B. Cohen, Geography and Politics in a Divided World (New York, 1963) pp. 64–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted by E. S. Virpsha in General Military Review (May 1968) p. 697.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Cohen, ‘The erosion of surface naval power’, in Foreign Affairs, XLIX (1971) 333.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Mazo and S. Hess, Nixon: A Political Portrait (New York, 1968) pp. 194–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. J. M. Hooson, A New Soviet Heartland? (Princeton, 1964) p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Tansky, ‘Soviet foreign aid to the less developed countries’ in New Directions in the Soviet Economy, Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington, 1866) pp. 964, 974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Whetten, ‘Empire or revolution? The dilemma of Russian policy’ in The New Middle East, VIII (1969) 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.J. Servan-Schreiber, The American Challenge, trans. R. Steel (London, 1968) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Morrison, ‘USSR and Third World: Ideal and Reality’ in Mizan XII (1970) 15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 W. H. Parker

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, W.H. (1972). Global Position and International Relations. In: The Superpowers. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01336-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics