Global Position and International Relations

  • W. H. Parker


The fundamental contrast between the two superpowers derives from the disposition of land and sea over the surface of the globe. If Wegener’s convincing hypothesis is true, the land originally formed a single mass, the outer parts of which have drifted away to form the separate continents.1 They are still close enough together, however, for it to be possible to divide the globe into two halves in such a way that one half is covered almost entirely by sea, while the other contains most of the land. This land hemisphere consists of one large unbroken central area and a surrounding zone of peninsulas and islands, some small and some of continental size.


International Relation Ballistic Missile Parliamentary Democracy Aircraft Carrier Warsaw Pact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Wegener, The Origins of Continents and Oceans, trans. J. Biram, introd. B. C. King (London, 1966).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. J. Mackinder, Democratic Ideals and Reality (London, 1919).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    S. B. Cohen, Geography and Politics in a Divided World (New York, 1963) pp. 64–5.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Quoted by E. S. Virpsha in General Military Review (May 1968) p. 697.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    P. Cohen, ‘The erosion of surface naval power’, in Foreign Affairs, XLIX (1971) 333.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    E. Mazo and S. Hess, Nixon: A Political Portrait (New York, 1968) pp. 194–5.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    D. J. M. Hooson, A New Soviet Heartland? (Princeton, 1964) p. 117.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    L. Tansky, ‘Soviet foreign aid to the less developed countries’ in New Directions in the Soviet Economy, Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington, 1866) pp. 964, 974.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    C. Whetten, ‘Empire or revolution? The dilemma of Russian policy’ in The New Middle East, VIII (1969) 11–15.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    J.J. Servan-Schreiber, The American Challenge, trans. R. Steel (London, 1968) p. 10.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    D. Morrison, ‘USSR and Third World: Ideal and Reality’ in Mizan XII (1970) 15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© W. H. Parker 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. H. Parker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations