Elasticity Pessimism, Absorption and Flexible Exchange Rates

  • Randall Hinshaw


The remarkable resurgence of interest in flexible exchange rates — which has even invaded circles, such as central banks, where formerly the subject was close to anathema — is doubtless in considerable measure inspired by the now justly famous ‘Tinbergen Principle’: the rule that, to assure the attainment of policy goals, the makers of policy need as many techniques as they have objectives. According to this criterion, if those in power want full employment and price stability and a high rate of capital formation and international balance without direct controls, they cannot hope to achieve these objectives by relying on only one or two techniques, such as variation in the money supply or in the level of government expenditure. Only by a happy coincidence will all objectives be attained if the number of tools is less than the number of goals and, in the absence of such an unlikely conjuncture, the most that can be achieved is some kind of ‘second-best’ compromise involving ‘trade-offs’ between, for example, employment and price stability, or employment and liberal trade policies.


Exchange Rate Price Elasticity Flexible Exchange Rate Exchange Rate Change Money Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Alejandro, Carlos F. Diaz. ‘Exchange-Rate Devaluation in a Semi-Industrialized Country: The Experience of Argentina, 1955–1961, ( Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965 ).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hinshaw, Randall. ‘American Prosperity and the British Balance-of-Payments Problem’, Review of Economics and Statistics, xxvii, (February 1945) 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hinshaw, Randall. ‘Currency Appreciation as an Anti-Inflationary Device’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, lxv, (November 1951) 447–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hinshaw, Randall. ‘The Effect of Devaluation on the Price Level: Further Comment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, lxxii (November 1958) 616–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Houthakker, H. S. and Magee, Stephen, P. ‘Income and Price Elasticities in World Trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics, li, (May 1969) 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Machlup, Fritz. ‘Elasticity Pessimism in International Trade’, Economia Internazionale, 1 (1950) 118–41; reprinted in his International Payments, Debts, and Gold: Collected Essays (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Michaely, Michael. ‘Relative-Prices and Income-Absorption Approaches to Devaluation: A Partial Reconciliation’, American Economic Review, l (March 1960) 144–7.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Orcutt, Guy H. ‘Measurement of Price Elasticities in International Trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics, xxxii (May 1950) 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Schultz, Henry. The Theory and Measurement of Demand ( Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938 ).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tinbergen, Jan. ‘Some Remarks on the Problem of Dollar Scarcity’, Econometrica, xvii (July 1949) Supplement, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Randall Hinshaw 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randall Hinshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Claremont Graduate SchoolUSA

Personalised recommendations