Abstract
The attempt to reply to a reply may seem inelegant; in the present case, however, I see it as necessary. Professor Tugendhat has presented his view of philosophy with great clarity, and related it to mine by criticism. I wish in turn to present my view through the criticism of his; if you like, I wish to complete the circle of debate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
I. M. Bochenski, The Methods of Contemporary Thought (Dordrecht, 1965 ) p. 65.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1972 The Royal Institute of Philosophy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pettit, P. (1972). The Case For Explanation Continued: A Reply To Professor Tugendhat. In: Mays, W., Brown, S.C. (eds) Linguistic Analysis and Phenomenology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01215-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01215-2_19
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-01217-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01215-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)