Abstract
The tradition of analysing the welfare effects of market power by reference to the concept of economic surplus as represented in the previously defined social welfare function is quite ancient, encompassing J. Dupuit (1844) and (certainly) Alfred Marshall. More recently this method has been used by Harberger [30], who was the first economist to use the concept of economic surplus to quantify the welfare effects of monopoly. The neo-classical approach to this issue, as outlined in Fig. 1, produced an unambiguous ‘deadweight’ loss of social welfare from market power and constituted a forceful case in favour of an antitrust policy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1973 Charles K. Rowley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowley, C.K. (1973). Neo-classical Economics and the Case for Antitrust. In: Antitrust and Economic Efficiency. Macmillan Studies in Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01113-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01113-1_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-12215-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01113-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)