Skip to main content

Neo-classical Economics and the Case for Antitrust

  • Chapter
Antitrust and Economic Efficiency

Part of the book series: Macmillan Studies in Economics ((MSE))

  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

The tradition of analysing the welfare effects of market power by reference to the concept of economic surplus as represented in the previously defined social welfare function is quite ancient, encompassing J. Dupuit (1844) and (certainly) Alfred Marshall. More recently this method has been used by Harberger [30], who was the first economist to use the concept of economic surplus to quantify the welfare effects of monopoly. The neo-classical approach to this issue, as outlined in Fig. 1, produced an unambiguous ‘deadweight’ loss of social welfare from market power and constituted a forceful case in favour of an antitrust policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 Charles K. Rowley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowley, C.K. (1973). Neo-classical Economics and the Case for Antitrust. In: Antitrust and Economic Efficiency. Macmillan Studies in Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01113-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics