Skip to main content

Alternative Views on Social Welfare

  • Chapter
Antitrust and Economic Efficiency

Part of the book series: Macmillan Studies in Economics ((MSE))

  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

The philosophy which underpins the social welfare function outlined in Section 2 of this survey is essentially that of the Pareto principle, with its concern for the welfare of all individuals in society rather than with some organic concept of the state, and with its emphasis that each individual in society must be considered to be the best judge of his own welfare. So extensive is the acceptance of this philosophy in economics that few economists would feel the necessity even of referring to these value judgements, which must be accepted before the public policy implications of Paretian analysis can have any relevance to the real world. This reticence is to be deplored, not least because the Paretian value judgements may well be less widely accepted outside than they appear to be within the economics profession. The implications of three alternative approaches to the antitrust debate are briefly outlined in this section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 Charles K. Rowley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowley, C.K. (1973). Alternative Views on Social Welfare. In: Antitrust and Economic Efficiency. Macmillan Studies in Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01113-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics