Skip to main content

Reform and Moral Crusade

  • Chapter
Book cover Social Movement

Part of the book series: Key Concepts in Political Science ((KCP))

  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

I have argued for the operational value of ‘social movement’ as a general type-concept in the study of social collectivities or groups. ‘Social movement’ was defined in chapter i as a deliberate collective endeavour to promote change, having at least a minimal degree of organization, and founded upon the normative commitment and active participation of followers or members. In chapters 3, 4 and 5, it has been proposed that a fairly comprehensive typology of social movement can be constructed, and that with the use of such a framework, it is profitable to examine some of the major concepts, theories and political implications of various major types of movement drawing on the extensive literature and using comparative analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See Charles Taylor, “Neutrality in Political Science”, in Philosophy, Politics and Society (Third Series), edited by Peter Laslett and W. G. Runciman, Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1967, pp. 25–57,

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Gunar Myrdal, Objectivity in Social Research, Duckworth, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. H. Chaloner, “The Agitation Against the Corn Laws”, in Popular Movements c. 1830–1850, edited by J. T. Ward, Macmillan, London 1970, p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Peter M. Blau, Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York 1964,

    Google Scholar 

  5. and Frank Parkin, Middle Class Radicalism, Manchester University Press, 1968,

    Google Scholar 

  6. Werner Sombart, Socialism and the Social Movement, Dent, London 1909, P. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. James Jupp, Political Parties, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1968, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Tucker, “The Deradiralization of Marxist Movements”, in American Political Science Review, Vol. LXI, No. 2, June 1967, pp. 343–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenneth Newton, The Sociology of British Communism, Allen Lane The Penguin Press, London 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, World Classics Edition, Oxford University Press, London 1952, pp. 376–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See, for example, Emile Durkheim, The Division of Labour, The Free Press, Glencoe, 2nd edn 1947;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Otto von Gierke, Natural Law and the Theory of Society, 15oo–1800, 2 vols, Cambridge University Press, 1913;

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. W. Maitland, “Introduction” to Otto von Gierke’s Political Theories of the Middle Age, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, 1900;

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Neville Figgis, Churches in the Modern State, Longmans, London 1913;

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. D. H. Cole, Guild Socialism Restated, Parsons, London 1920;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harold J. Laski, A Grammar of Politics, Yale University Press, New Haven 1925;

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Bernard Crick, In Defence of Politics, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See, for example, Karl Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1936;

    Google Scholar 

  19. Erich Fromm, The Fear of Freedom, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1942;

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hannah Arendt, The Burden of our Time, Secker and Warburg, London 1951;

    Google Scholar 

  21. William Kornhauser, The Politics of Mass Society, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Kornhauser, “Mass Society and Mass Phenomena”, International Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences, Vol. 10, 1968, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. M. Lipset, M. Trow, J. Coleman, Union Democracy, The Free Press, Glencoe 1956, pp. 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  24. On the Chartists, see Mark Hovell, The Chartist Movement, Manchester University Press, 1943;

    Google Scholar 

  25. Asa Briggs (ed.), Chartist Studies, Macmillan, London 1959;

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. R. Schoyen, The Chartist Challenge, Heinemann, London 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Among the few full-length contributions in this area the reader is referred to: Abraham Holtzman, The Townsend Movement: A Study in Old Age Politics, Bookman Associates, New York 1963;

    Google Scholar 

  28. and Mary R. Dearing, Veterans in Politics: The Story of the GAR, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martin Luther King, Chaos or Community? Hodder and Stoughton, London 1968, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Peter M. Blau, Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York 1964, PP. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills (eds), Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1948, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Frank Parkin, Middle Class Radicalism, Manchester University Press, 1968, P. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See G. D. H. Cole, A Short History of the British Working Class Movement 1789–1947, Allen and Unwin, London, rev. edn 1948,

    Google Scholar 

  34. See S. M. Lipset, “Student Opposition in the us”, Government and Opposition, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1966, pp. 351 – 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. See Abrams and A. Little, “The Young Voter in British Politics”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1965, p. 95;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. and F. Musgrove, Youth and the Social Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See A. Roberts (ed.), The Strategy of Civilian Defence, Faber and Faber, London 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1971 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilkinson, P. (1971). Reform and Moral Crusade. In: Social Movement. Key Concepts in Political Science. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01093-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics