Skip to main content

New Theory of Vision: Heterogeneity

  • Chapter
Berkeley

Part of the book series: Philosophers in Perspective

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

In the texts thus far examined Berkeley rejects the ‘optical angle’ theory of distance perception. By way of proof, he introduces the case of the man-born-blind-made-to-see. This thought-experiment is taken to establish that there is no necessary relation between the data of sight and touch. Indeed it is held that there is a real and radical separation. Extension as seen is not the same as tactual extension. Visual extension is inseparable from colour, and colour it is agreed is ‘not without the mind’. The data of touch and sight can be thought of as minima visibilia’and tangibilia, the ultimate constituents of each portion of our sensory experience. In a few short pages Berkeley ranges over a number of difficult issues, but he makes it clear that a central concern is the analysis of extension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Aristotle, De Interpretatione, in Aristotle’s Categories De Interpretatione trans. J. L. Ackrill (Oxford University Press, 1963), ch. r, 16a3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1974 Harry M. Bracken

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bracken, H.M. (1974). New Theory of Vision: Heterogeneity. In: Berkeley. Philosophers in Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00990-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics