Abstract
In the texts thus far examined Berkeley rejects the ‘optical angle’ theory of distance perception. By way of proof, he introduces the case of the man-born-blind-made-to-see. This thought-experiment is taken to establish that there is no necessary relation between the data of sight and touch. Indeed it is held that there is a real and radical separation. Extension as seen is not the same as tactual extension. Visual extension is inseparable from colour, and colour it is agreed is ‘not without the mind’. The data of touch and sight can be thought of as minima visibilia’and tangibilia, the ultimate constituents of each portion of our sensory experience. In a few short pages Berkeley ranges over a number of difficult issues, but he makes it clear that a central concern is the analysis of extension.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Aristotle, De Interpretatione, in Aristotle’s Categories De Interpretatione trans. J. L. Ackrill (Oxford University Press, 1963), ch. r, 16a3.
Copyright information
© 1974 Harry M. Bracken
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bracken, H.M. (1974). New Theory of Vision: Heterogeneity. In: Berkeley. Philosophers in Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00990-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00990-9_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-00992-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-00990-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)