There is in the Principles a transition from arguments against matter to arguments in support of immaterialism. Berkeley believes that he has established that if matter existed, it could not be known. Second, he believes that he has exposed the contradictory content of the concept of matter and of the several accounts of perception and knowledge which utilise that concept. The absurdity of an unperceiving substance in which pains inhere, of pains which are unfelt, of inactive causes etc. has been made evident. The other side of the Principles is Berkeley’s attempt to provide that positive account of ourselves, of the world and of God, which he promises in the Preface.
KeywordsPersonal Identity Perceptual Experience Innate Idea Individual Soul Mental Substance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Henry Lee, Anti-Scepticism: or, Notes Upon Each Chapter of Mr. Lock’s Essay… ( London, R. Clavel and C. Harper, 1702 ) pp. 124–5.Google Scholar
- 6.Edward Stillingfleet, A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (1697) ch. x., in Works (London, Henry and George Mortlock, 1710) sn, p. 504.Google Scholar
- 11.Cf. Noam Chomsky, Cartesian Linguistics (New York, Harper & Row, 1966), Language and Mind (New York, Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968), and in several subsequent papers.Google Scholar
- 16.Antoine Arnauld, Des vrayes et des fausses idées… (Cologne, Nicholas Schouten, 1683) ch. v, § 6, pp., 36–7.Google Scholar