Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Art and Morality

Part of the book series: New Studies in Practical Philosophy ((NSPP))

Abstract

People sometimes ask what point there is in art, or whether it has a point. Often, of course, these are not genuine questions but rather expressions of an extreme scepticism about the value of poetry, of sculpture or of drama. The questioner has never understood these things, or perhaps can no longer imagine what he once saw in them. And he explains his blindness by maintaining that there is nothing to see, and that those who claim to see something are themselves blind. For others, however, the questions are not simply rhetorical, but stem from perplexity about the nature of art, or about what it is for some activity to be worth while. They are questions which philosophers try to answer.

For if it be, as I affirm, that no learning is so good as that which teacheth and moveth to virtue, and that none can both teach and move thereto so much as Poetry, then is the conclusion manifest that ink and paper cannot be to a more profitable purpose employed.1

Sir Philip Sidney

No artist has ethical sympathies.All art is quite useless.2

Oscar Wilde

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1971 R. W. Beardsmore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beardsmore, R.W. (1971). Introduction. In: Art and Morality. New Studies in Practical Philosophy. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00952-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics