Towards an Assessment

  • Joseph Frankel
Part of the Key Concepts in Political Science book series (KCP)


With a subject of this nature, it would be impracticable to attempt a summary and conclusion of the book in the customary way. The argument is much too condensed to allow a meaningful brief summary; so many conclusions could be drawn from it that any selected by the author may strike the readers as idiosyncratic and arbitrary. The task of forming conclusions as to the nature of the concept will then be left to the individual reader who can, if necessary, easily refresh his memory of the argument by looking again through the whole book which is, after all, quite short. This chapter will merely attempt to get the subject into a broader perspective by discussing the issues of the clarity of perception of national interest, of its rationality and of its relationship with inter- and supranational values. These should be helpful both when applying the scheme to the analysis of the national interest of a specific single state and when looking for some general conclusions.


Foreign Policy National Interest European Economic Community Rational Principle Vital Interest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and Reference

  1. 1.
    Cf. R. V. Daniels, “The Chinese Revolution in Russian Perspective”, World Politics, 1968. esp. p. 223.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    see also, G. Niemeyer, An Inquiry into Soviet Neutraliy, 1956;Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Lindsay, China and the Cold War, 1955.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pall Mall Press Ltd. London 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Frankel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations