Skip to main content

Political Systems and Social Stratification

  • Chapter
Social Mobility and Political Change

Part of the book series: Key Concepts in Political Science ((KCP))

Abstract

The assumption behind this book is that ‘social mobility’ is important for the study of modern political change for three reasons. First, the concept of mobility is one that has important cultural implications and thus consequences for the ideologies of political parties, governments and electors. In part this is related to concepts of egalitarianism (which often means equal opportunity for success rather than a levelling-out of living standards), liberalism, the ‘open society’ and utilitarianism. The Protestant ethic, the ‘opportunity state’, a ‘property-owning democracy’ and the ‘ragsto-riches’ saga, all are part and parcel of the rhetoric of modern societies. In a negative way—by their emphasis on equality and hard work rather than social status and occupational mobility—the Communist states share part of this culture (and of course in terms of their actual changes in stratification show even higher rates of upward mobility). Since the English Civil War and the Protectorate the concept of social mobility and rule by an élite of the economically successful has been a dominating factor in Western political ideas and has recently become important throughout the world. Thus quite apart from the statistical incidents of mobility the idea itself is an important element in the development of political culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. W. Goldschmidt, Comparative Functionalism, University of California Press, Berkeley 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Etzioni, The Active Society, Free Press, New York 1968, Part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Parsons, The Social System, Free Press, New York 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karl, W. Deutsch, “Social Mobilization and Political Development”, American Political Science Review, IN, 3, 1961, pp. 493–514.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism, Yale University Press, New Haven 1957, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1970 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davies, I. (1970). Political Systems and Social Stratification. In: Social Mobility and Political Change. Key Concepts in Political Science. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00920-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics