Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Studies in the Philosophy of Religion ((NSPR))

Abstract

Some of the most serious objections that the Argument from Design has had to meet — in particular, those made by Hume in his Dialogues concerning Natural Religion — have been directed at its character as an analogical argument. In the present chapter I consider some of the chief difficulties that arise, or have been thought to arise, in this connection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 Thomas McPherson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McPherson, T. (1972). Analogy. In: The Argument from Design. New Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00746-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics