Skip to main content
Book cover

Memory pp 103–114Cite as

Is Memory Reliable?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Problems of Philosophy ((PRPH))

Abstract

If there is to be such a thing as memory-knowledge, we will need some way of telling whether the facts we remember are indeed facts —whether the things we remember happening did actually happen. For memory is not always correct; we sometimes think we remember various things, and it turns out that those things are not so; sometimes we are not sure, or simply do not know, whether we are remembering something or merely imagining it. This leads, as we saw in chapter 1, to the search for a “memory indicator,” something that will mark off the genuine cases of memory from cases of mere imagination or of mistakenly thinking we remember. But the search proved unsuccessful; we saw that although we can tell—or rather, know without having to tell—whether we are trying to remember as opposed to deliberately making things up, there is no way of telling, from our remembering itself, whether we are remembering correctly or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1971 Don Locke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Locke, D. (1971). Is Memory Reliable?. In: Memory. Problems of Philosophy. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00702-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics