Abstract
During and since the First World War political and military leaders in Britain were often criticised on account of their out ofdate policies or strategies which, it was said, may have been suitable for winning the Crimean War or even the Boer War, but were utterly unsuitable for winning the war of 1914. In the Second World War leadership was rightly accused of pursuing certain military strategies and economic policies that might have been suitable for winning the First World War but were utterly inadequate for winning the Second World War. Similarly, many of the economic policies adopted since 1945 were said to have been suitable for winning the peace of 1919–39 but were utterly unsuitable for winning the peace that followed the Second World War.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1970 Paul Einzig
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Einzig, P. (1970). Trying to Win the Last Peace?. In: The Case against Floating Exchanges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00681-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00681-6_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-00683-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-00681-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)