Abstract
The December election, by contrast with January’s, followed an autumn of relative political calm. The campaign itself was not only shorter, but also quieter than its predecessor. How far this was evidence of public apathy was much debated. Sidney Low described the election as ‘the most apathetic within living memory’,1 but Sydney Brooks, another respected observer, noted that the ‘uncanny decorum of the election did not imply disinterest’.2 And in fact the turnout indicates that public interest remained high.3 One other contrast with January is important. While the first election remained throughout a debate on all the great issues of the day, in the second election the constitutional question achieved the primacy denied it in January.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Balfour Papers, Add. MS. 49777, ff. 79–81, Long to Balfour, 20 Jan 1911. This letter is quoted at length in Peter Fraser, ‘The Unionist Dbcle of 1911 and Balfour’s Retirement’, Journal of Modern History, xxxv (1963) 356.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1972 Neal Blewett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blewett, N. (1972). The Second Campaign. In: The Peers, the Parties and the People. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00652-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00652-6_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-00654-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-00652-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)