Skip to main content

Abstract

The December election, by contrast with January’s, followed an autumn of relative political calm. The campaign itself was not only shorter, but also quieter than its predecessor. How far this was evidence of public apathy was much debated. Sidney Low described the election as ‘the most apathetic within living memory’,1 but Sydney Brooks, another respected observer, noted that the ‘uncanny decorum of the election did not imply disinterest’.2 And in fact the turnout indicates that public interest remained high.3 One other contrast with January is important. While the first election remained throughout a debate on all the great issues of the day, in the second election the constitutional question achieved the primacy denied it in January.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Balfour Papers, Add. MS. 49777, ff. 79–81, Long to Balfour, 20 Jan 1911. This letter is quoted at length in Peter Fraser, ‘The Unionist Dbcle of 1911 and Balfour’s Retirement’, Journal of Modern History, xxxv (1963) 356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1972 Neal Blewett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blewett, N. (1972). The Second Campaign. In: The Peers, the Parties and the People. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00652-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics