Party Finance

  • Neal Blewett


The fog of secrecy which shrouds the party coffers makes an assessment of the financial resources of the parties difficult. We can begin by an examination of the returned costs for both elections which are set out in Table 14.1. Taking the most useful figure for comparison, the expenses per opposed candidate, three distinct levels of expenditure are apparent, first the major parties, then Labour, and then the Nationalists. If this provides a rough ranking of the parties according to their financial resources four qualifications need to be remembered. First, much expenditure by the central authorities is not recorded in these figures because it was not directly attributable to any candidate; secondly, there was probably some fudging of returns by candidates of the two large parties;1 thirdly, the Labour average hides a rather unusual and significant distribution of costs per candidate; fourthly elections in Ireland were much cheaper than in Great Britain.2


Trade Union Central Authority Labour Party Socialist Society General Fund 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Neal Blewett 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neal Blewett
    • 1
  1. 1.Flinders University of South AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations