Skip to main content
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

Newspaper men found the election rather tiresome; and some of the reasons for their feeling make the press in 1966 an unusually interesting subject of study. Certainly few changes of importance had occurred since 1964 within the industry. The pattern of circulation and readership remained much the same (see table). So did the pattern of ownership. But certain disadvantages — some familiar, others new — faced newspapers in their role as media of communication. And in their other role, that of active champions of one or other political party, there was less wholehearted commitment even than seventeen months before. The Daily Mirrorand Daily Express, which between them reached two-thirds of the electorate, both found themselves awkwardly caught between cross-pressures that distorted their traditional loyalties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1966 D. E. Butler and Anthony King

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seymour-Ure, C. (1966). The Press. In: The British General Election of 1966. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00548-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics