Abstract
Most general elections in recent years have been contests between two parties for control of the commons, and they have been conducted along fairly clear lines established prior to the campaigns themselves. The psephological interest in these elections has concerned the question of which party would win, and it has been assumed that someone would win. It has also been a foregone conclusion that no election would make a fundamenatl difference to the political structure of the country, and that the parties would be the same ones after the election as before it. In 1922 there was a race, but nobody knew precisely which parties were opposing each other, as the party alliances varied from place to place. As the Manchester Guardian said, ‘never perhaps has a general election been held where the issues were less clear and the electors received less guidance.’ J. L. Garvin, editor of the Observer, said he would be ‘surprised at nothing; anything may happen’, and The Nation described the campaign as ‘a state of confusion unknown in any former election. The old party lines are gone’.1
For if the trumpet give forth an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle?
I Corinthians, xiv 8
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Manchester Guardian (13 November 1922); J. L. Garvin Papers, 1922 domestic politics notebook; Nation (11 November 1922).
The Times (9 November 1922); Daily Mail (1 November 1922); Doncaster Gazette (10 November 1922).
South Wales Argus (11 October 1922).
Gloucester Journal (21 October 1922).
See, for instance, the Diehard remarks on beer in Yorkshire Post (9 September and 8 November 1922); Yorkshire Evening
Press (1 July 1922); Oxford Times (3 November 1922); Maidenhead Advertiser (1 November 1922); Gloucester Journal (4 November 1922); Huntingdonshire Post (2 November 1922); and Doncaster Gazette (10 November 1922). The last also reported that some Doncaster Diehards extended their interest to ginger beer.
Amery, My Political Life, II 241; The Times (24, 26 October and 1 November 1922).
Gleanings and Memoranda (December 1922) 554; Gaunt, Yield of the Years, 278.
South Wales Argus (12 and 17 October 1922); Morning Post (18 October 1922); The Times (11 and 14 November 1922); Liverpool Post (10 November 1922).
Scotsman (30 October 1922); The Times (1 November 1922); Pontefract Advertiser (30 September, 1 and 4 November 1922).
Bristol Adventurer (3 November 1922).
The Times (1 November 1922); Yorkshire Post (7 November 1922); Doncaster Gazette (3 and 10 November 1922).
Amery, Thoughts on the Constitution, 16.
Salvidge, Salvidge of Liverpool, 238; Reading Papers, EUR/E/238/5 [Peel to Reading, 25 October 1922].
Bristol Evening News (11 November 1922); East London Observer (11 November 1922); The Times (9 November 1922); Stirling Observer (26 October 1922); Dumbarton Herald (1 November 1922); Accrington Gazette (28 October 1922); Maidenhead Advertiser (1 November 1922).
Liverpool Post (26 October 1922); North Berks Herald (1 November 1922); Southeastern Gazette (3 and 14 November 1922); Berkshire Chronicle (2 June 1922); Oxford Mail (10 November 1922).
Bulwell Local News (11 November 1922); Hackney Gazette (1 November 1922).
Chorley Guardian (4 November 1922); Northampton Daily Chronicle (21 July, 28 October, 3 and 6 November 1922).
Hexham Herald (28 October 1922); Monmouthshire Beacon (27 October 1922); Finchley Press (7 July, 20, 30 October and 3 November 1922); West Kent Argus (3 November 1922); Leicester Daily Mercury (30 October 1922); Salisbury Times (27 October 1922).
Morning Post (16 October 1922); Southern Daily Echo (19 October 1922).
Beckenham Journal (11 November 1922).
Liverpool Post (10 November 1922).
The figures for turn-out in 1918 and 1922 which have been published previously have been based on the assumption that voters in the two-member constituencies each cast two votes. In fact there were numerous ‘plumpers’, and taking this into account affects the turn-out figures considerably. The figures given here count all ‘plumpers’.
Copyright information
© 1973 Michael Kinnear
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kinnear, M. (1973). The Uncertain Trumpet: political confusion in early November 1922. In: The Fall of Lloyd George. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00520-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00520-8_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-00522-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-00520-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)