Skip to main content

Hegel’s Moral Psychology

  • Chapter
  • 8 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Studies in Ethics ((NSE))

Abstract

I propose to conclude this brief survey of Hegel’s ethical opinions by examining some aspects of his moral psychology. This is a difficult subject, if only because Hegel is much less explicit about it than he might have been. In much of the Philosophy of Right he uses Kantian language, and in particular seems to retain the concept of duty in the privileged position Kant assigned to it. But we have seen above (especially in Sections V and VI) that he thought there were radical defects in Kant’s picture of the moral situation. The Kantian antithesis of reason and inclination was much too sharp; it was not true to say that we could act rationally only if we could subdue our animal impulses, nor that any activity which was prompted by inclination must be mechanically determined. An altogether different account of the position must be given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1969 W. H. Walsh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walsh, W.H. (1969). Hegel’s Moral Psychology. In: Hegelian Ethics. New Studies in Ethics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00489-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics