Abstract
Several writers have suggested that the introduction of automation or technically complex production systems (utilizing advance programming of machine operations and feed-back mechanisms for automatic self-control and self-regulation, will drastically change the roles of foremen. The more extreme predict the elimination of the need for production supervisors altogether. Two relatively moderate examples of such predictions can be given here:
While the exact position varies widely, it is usually true to say that automation reduces the number of workers supervised by a given foreman, so that this side of his function diminishes in importance. But a more fundamental change stems from the nature of the work being supervised. The worker need no longer exert continuous physical effort to maintain output; instead he monitors a continuous process and, in doing so, seems to acquire a sense of responsibility towards the plant itself and an attitude of mind quite different from that of the semi-skilled worker in mass-production work. He is largely self-supervising, but there is a good deal of indirect supervision as he is in close touch with management, reporting the plant’s behaviour and so on. So the need for direct supervision of his work is very much reduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
E. R. F. W. Crossman, ‘Automation and Skill’, Problems of Progress in Industry No. 9, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. HMSO, London, 1960, p. 51.
Robert Dubin, The World of Work. Industrial Society and Human Relations. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1958, p. 206.
P. Blau, ’ studies on Technical Change, Steel and Aluminium’, C.I.R.F. Training for Progress 1962, No. 3.
W. H. Scott, et al. Technical Change and Industrial Relations Liverpool University Press, 1956.
Charles R. Walker, Robert H. Guest, and Arthur N. Turner, The Foreman on the Assembly Line Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1956.
E.P.A. Report on the Training of Foremen in Europe Paris, 1958.
Industrial Relations Staff, Ford Motor Company, England, Supervisor Responsibilities and Authority Dagenham, England, 1963.
National Institute of Industrial Psychology, The Foreman: A Study of Supervision in British Industry Staples, London.
Rensis Likert, New Patterns of Management McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, 1961.
Ibid. p. 6.
Ibid. p. 7.
Ibid. p. 102.
Ibid. p. 11.
E. A. Fleishman, Leadership Climate and Supervisory Behaviour: A study of the Leadership Role of the Foreman in an Industrial Situation. Columbus, Ohio State University Personnel Research Board, 1951.
J. Handyside, An Experiment with Supervisory Training National Institute of Industrial Psychology, London, 1956.
F. E. Ennery and E. L. Trist, ’ socio-Technical Systems ‘, Proc. 6th Annual International Meeting of the Institute of Management Sciences London, New York, Paris, Los Angeles, Pergana Press, 1960. Management Sciences, Models and Techniques, Vol. II.
R. Likert, op. cit. p. 78.
Ibid. p. 114.
L. R. Sayles, Behaviour of Industrial Work Groups Wiley, New York, 1958.
T. Lupton, On the Shop Floor: Two Studies of Workshop Organisation and Output Pergamon Press, Oxford, London, New York, Paris, 1963.
K. E. Thurley and A. C. Hamblin, ‘The Supervisor’s role in Production Control’, Int. Journal Prod. Research 1962, 1, No. 4.
K. E. Thurley and A. C. Hamblin, ‘The Supervisor and his Job’, Problems of Progress in Industry No. 13, HMSO, 1963.
A. C. Hamblin, ‘The Nature of Supervisory Tasks’. (In French.) Sociologie du Travail 1963, 5, July/September, 225.
Ibid. p. 6 (English version available in a duplicated reprint).
Ibid. p. 7.
J. A. Bright, ‘Does Automation raise skill requirements?’, Harvard Business Review 1958, 36, No. 4, July/August.
Joan Woodward, ‘Management and Technology’, Problems of Progress in Industry No. 3 (DSIR) HMSO, 1958.
K. E. Thurley and A. C. Hamblin, Ref. 22, op. cit. p. 15.
Ibid. p. 20.
T. Burns and G. M. Stalker, The Management of Innovation London, Tavistock Publications, 1961. Chicago, Quadrangle, 1962.
D. MacGregor, The Human Side of the Enterprise New York, McGraw Hill, 1960.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1966 International Institute for Labour Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thurley, K.E. (1966). Changing Technology and The Supervisor. In: Stieber, J. (eds) Employment Problems of Automation and Advanced Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00444-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00444-7_22
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-00446-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-00444-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)