Abstract
After the calling off of the General Strike, the General Council was immediately faced with the problem of how to explain its decision to the movement. It was at first proposed to convene a conference of executives during the summer of 1926, but with the Miners’ lock-out still continuing, and with the movement bitterly divided over the Council’s decision, the conference was postponed with the Miners’ agreement. Thus, when the 1926 Congress met at Bournemouth the events of May had still not been debated. The General Council reported to Congress that it intended to postpone an inquest until after the termination of the mining dispute. This was expecting a good deal of restraint from Congress delegates, and the decision was challenged by Jack Tanner of the Amalgamated Engineering Union. Tanner raised an important point. The General Council, he argued, was elected by Congress and was responsible to it; it had no right to withhold information or prevent discussion of so vital an issue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1968 John Lovell and B. C. Roberts
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lovell, J., Roberts, B.C. (1968). Facing the Facts, 1926–31. In: A Short History of the T.U.C. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00435-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00435-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-00437-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-00435-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)