The Past as Destiny

  • J. H. Plumb


The past in relation to human destiny is a vast and complex subject. Religion by its very nature is inextricably involved with the past regarded as destiny. In all early societies for which we have records, there were immortal gods whose relations with men in the past naturally threw light on their attitudes in the present. With self-confidence that no experience could daunt, priests interpreted the earlier behaviour of the gods in order to predict the fate of individual men in the future. Heaven, hell, rebirth or oblivion, each religion possessed a built-in pattern of destiny, some complex, some simple, some capable of change and variety, others immutable for century after century. Yet for many of these religions the past was a huge catalogue of examples which were rarely involved in the historical process as such. I shall say very little about these religions, except for Christianity, which required a much more historical commitment than any other religion.


Fourth Century Ancient World Theological Past Romantic Historian Movement Confidence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Needham, Wang Ling and D. J. de Solla Price, Heavenly Clockwork (Cambridge, 1960 );Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    also J. Needham, Time and the Eastern Man, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Occasional Papers, no. 21 (London, 1965 ), 17–19;Google Scholar
  3. 1.
    J. Needham, Science and Civilization in China (Cambridge, 1965), iv (2) 465–80. The most elaborate and complex astronomic clock of the T’ang dynasty appears to have been devised so that the position of the stars would be known even if the Heavens were cloudy, in case any of the Emperor’s wives or concubines conceived.Google Scholar
  4. 1.
    Also, D. J. de Solla Price, Science since Babylon (New Haven, 1961). Criticism of some of Needham’s claims will be found in Carlo M. Cipolla, Clocks and Culture, 1300–1700 (1967), 152, but he does not deny the elaboration of the Chinese astronomical instruments. The whole problem of the social environment needed to promote scientific investigation and technical discovery is still a vital and unsolved problem for the historian of society as well as of science.Google Scholar
  5. 1.
    See J. Needham, ‘Science and Society in East and West’, Science and Society (New York, 1964), xxviii 385–408 ‘Poverties and Triumphs of the Chinese Scientific Tradition’, in Scientific Change ed. A. C. Crombie (London, 1963), 117–49.Google Scholar
  6. 1.
    The explosive nature of this subject was further demonstrated by the controversy which followed the publication of J. E. C. Hill, The Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution (Oxford, 1965)Google Scholar
  7. 1.
    for the most important critical reviews of which see H. R. Trevor-Roper, History and Theory (Middletown,1966), v 61–82Google Scholar
  8. 1.
    and A. R. Hall, ‘The Scientific and Puritan Revolution’, History (1965), 332–7.Google Scholar
  9. 1.
    See Helmut Rehder, ‘Planetenkinder’, The Graduate Journal (University of Texas, Austin 1968), viii 69–97, for a discussion of the complex involvement of astrological concepts in art and literature by the sixteenth century. The subject is vast, and later centuries, i.e. the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth, are largely neglected by social historians.Google Scholar
  10. 1.
    Bishop Burnet, History of His Own Time (2nd ed., Oxford, 1833), i 175. Shaftesbury was in no way singular for his age.Google Scholar
  11. 1.
    A. Momigliano, ‘Time in Ancient Historiography’, History and Theory (Middletown, (1966), Beiheft 6, 18–19.Google Scholar
  12. 1.
    Josephus, The Jewish War, ed. M. I. Finley (New York, 1965), xvi—XVIII.Google Scholar
  13. 1.
    S. G. F. Brandon, History, Time and Deity (Manchester, 1965), 160 ff., and especially 160 n.Google Scholar
  14. 2.
    For the development of ideas about history in early Christianity, see also Erich Dinkier, ‘Earliest Christianity’, in The Idea of History in the Ancient Near East ed. Robert C. Dentan (New Haven, 1955), 171–214.Google Scholar
  15. 2.
    Also C. H. Dodd, History and the Gospel (1938);Google Scholar
  16. 2.
    Oscar Cullmann, Christ and Time, trans. F. V. Filson (rev. ed., 1962 ).Google Scholar
  17. 1.
    See A. A. Barb, ‘The Survival of Magic Arts’, in The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century ed. A. Mom-igliano (Oxford, 1963), 100–25. The Council of Laodicea forbade the exaggerated cult of angels. The miraculous survived. In the sixth century a cloud of Irish saints walked across the Bristol Channel and roosted in the villages of north Devon and Cornwall. Like wonders occurred throughout Christendom.Google Scholar
  18. 1.
    Orosius (c. 417) provided the final amalgam of pagan and Christian history in a form regarded as entirely suitable for the Christian world, but it was the end of a long process begun in Alexandria in the second century. Naturally it became easier to accomplish as paganism died, its books obliterated or forgotten. But it was only achieved by ignoring a great deal of the history of the ancient world. ‘No real Christian historiography founded on the political experience of Herodotus, Thucydides, Livy and Tacitus was transmitted to the Middle Ages’: A. Momigliano, ‘Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century A.D.’, in The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century 89. The crucial figure in the development of a Christian chronology was Eusebius, for whom see D. S. Wallace-Hadrill, Eusebius of Caesarea (1960), 155–67.Google Scholar
  19. 1.
    For the activity of forgers in the Middle Ages and the credulity with which the ancient charters were accepted, see H. Fuhrmann, ‘Die Falschungen im Mittel alten’, Historische Zeitschrift (1963),cxcvii 529–54. Naturally this was challenged, but see Fuhrmann’s vigorous riposte, ibid. 580–601.Google Scholar
  20. 1.
    See also W. Ullmann, A History of Political Thought: The Middle Ages (1965), 80–85: ‘The aim of these forgers–and considering the extent of their fabrications there must have been whole ateliers of workers–was to buttress the hierocratic thesis by surrounding it with the halo of antiquity. As with most medieval forgeries, they did not in many cases invent anything out of the blue, but clothed an already virtually accepted thesis in the garb of an ancient decree.’ Three-quarters of the imperial decrees of the Benedictus Levita are false: ibid. 83–84. Even when exposed, forgeries continued to be accepted; the past was too valuable to be rejected on merely sceptical grounds, hence the exposure of the Donation of Constantine (c. moo) by John the Deacon had no long-term results, although it influenced the actions of Otto III. The time was not propitious. It was, however, in the more sceptical age of Lorenzo Valla four hundred years later, when its exposure created a sensation, but then the past was being assailed and reconstructed. The belief in, and market for holy relics–the past made visible–led, as with charters, to their being forged and manufactured in quantity; there was enough True Cross to build a galleon, and at one time twelve foreskins of Christ were being venerated, one in the Pope’s own church of St John Lateran. For the Donation of Constantine, see Ullmann, op. cit. 97–98;Google Scholar
  21. 1.
    for relics, G. Rattray Taylor, Sex in History (1953), 42–43;Google Scholar
  22. 1.
    also H. C. Lea, Studies in Church History (Philadelphia, 1883 ), 46–61.Google Scholar
  23. 1.
    They did not wish to understand the past in its own terms. They wanted to use it for political ends, for it to serve statesmen as it had hitherto served moralists as a guide to conduct. Yet, in many ways, modern historical study stems from their work and the work of their contemporaries. Machiavelli’s threat to the Christian past was not immediately recognized, but once the Counter-Reformation was under way his name began to arouse horror and detestation in orthodox circles. See Felix Raab, The English Face of Machiavelli (1964), 3–4. See also A. Momigliano, ‘Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century A.D.’ in The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century 89: ‘When in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries the humanists rediscovered their Herodotus, Thucydides, Livy and Tacitus, they rediscovered something for which there was no plain Christian alternative… The models for political and military history remained irretrievably pagan.’Google Scholar
  24. 1.
    William Haller, Foxe’s Book of Martyrs and the Elect Nation (1963).Google Scholar
  25. 1.
    Rev. F. W. Farrar, The People of England (n.d.), 36.Google Scholar
  26. 1.
    Peter Gay, A Loss of Mastery: Puritan Historians in Colonial America (California University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
  27. 1.
    Indeed, America quickly adopted the Whig interpretation of history, tracing its own love of liberty to its ‘Gothic’, its Saxon past. See Samuel Kliger, ‘Emerson and the Usable Anglo-Saxon Past’, Journal of the History of Ideas (1955), xvi 476–93.Google Scholar
  28. 2.
    David Levin, History as Romantic Art (Stanford University Press, 1959), 24. ‘The minute and unwearied research, the scrupulous fidelity and impartial justice with which you execute your task, prove tome that you are properly sensible of the high calling of the American press — that rising tribunal before which the whole world is to be summoned, its history to be revised and rewritten, and the judgment of past ages to be cancelled or confirmed.’ (Washington Irving to Motley, loc. cit.)Google Scholar
  29. 2.
    Also Richard Hofstadter, The Progressive Historians (New York, 1968), Is ff. The ‘Whig’ interpretation was, however, well established before the romantic historians. See Kliger, op. cit. 457, for a powerful expression of it in 1799.Google Scholar
  30. 1.
    Of course, white men. America’s past was white and it was, of course, like England’s or Germany’s, a racist past. It could be, and was, used to justify slavery, and when that was abolished, it was used to justify the subjection of the blacks. Indeed, the sense of a special white destiny, implicit in America’s history, made it easy for the new states of the Middle West to adopt with confidence a rigorous racist policy towards the blacks. The Brahmins too could patronize the blacks and despise them on the same grounds of manifest, historical destiny - and did. The blacks, like the European proletariat, had no past except for a few myths of protest - a Nat Turner for a Robin Hood. The curious exception to this situation is the growing idealization of a certain type of Indian warrior which we find in Fenimore Cooper, Henry Longfellow and others. For the influence of the white past on racist attitudes, see Winthrop D. Jordan, White Over Black: American Attitudes to the Negro, 1550–1812 (Chapel Hill, 1968 );Google Scholar
  31. 1.
    V. J. Voegeli, Free but not Equal: The Midwest and the Negro during the Civil War (Chicago, 1968). It is interesting that the last two years have witnessed a determination amongst the blacks to acquire a past of their own. Like many a white past it has little to do with history. An obvious illustration is the elementary schoolbook, The Freedom Primer. The same development occurred in Ghana where the murals were painted to show how Ghana had invented both the alphabet and the steam-engine. There is no need for laughter and none to sneer; all white pasts have made assumptions equally outrageous and for exactly the same purpose — to create both confidence and a sense of special virtue. Indeed, is it less arrogant to claim the steam-engine and the alphabet than ‘freedom’ and ‘liberty’ and ‘equality’ in a society in which there were slave markets? White history is not notable for its clear-eyed vision of things as they were.Google Scholar
  32. 1.
    J. B. Bury, The Idea of Progress (Dover ed., 1955 ), 37–63.Google Scholar
  33. 1.
    See Charles Frankel, The Faith of Reason (New York 1948), which is the most penetrating of many studies of the idea of progress in the eighteenth century.Google Scholar
  34. 1.
    Glyn E. Daniel, A Hundred Years of Archaeology (1950);Google Scholar
  35. 1.
    Charles C. Gillispie, Genesis and Geology (Harvard, 1951 ).Google Scholar
  36. 1.
    J. H. Plumb, ‘Thomas Babington Macaulay’, in Men and Places (1963), 250–66.Google Scholar
  37. 2.
    Richard Hofstadter, Social Darwinism in American Thought (Philadelphia, 1944);Google Scholar
  38. 2.
    J. W. Burrow, Evolution and Society (Cambridge, 1966), particularly 113–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J. H. Plumb 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Plumb
    • 1
  1. 1.Christ’s CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations