Advertisement

Burghley pp 270-292 | Cite as

Lord and Dynast

  • B. W. Beckingsale

Abstract

Queen Elizabeth was a strict guardian of the fount of honour. William Cecil did well to secure one of the ten new peerages created in her long reign by a Queen who preferred to ennoble ‘old blood’. His was the only noble title to be given exclusively on the grounds of political and administrative services to the Crown. He was one of two among the new peers who did not already possess ancestral claims or blood relationship to the Queen.1 His predecessor as Lord Treasurer, William Paulet, had received a marquisate and an earldom in Edward’s reign. But Burghley could flatter himself that his was a rare honour which had not fallen to any of his contemporaries in Elizabethan officialdom. Admission to an élite of some sixty peers was a reward for a family which had given loyal service to the Tudors for nearly a century.

Keywords

Marriage Market Fine House Family Honour Personal Emotion Feudal Lord 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 9.
    Ascham, op. cit. 205; R. Pace, cited F. Caspari, Humanism and Social Order in Tudor England (Chicago, 1954), 150; Holinshed, op. cit. (1808), ed. J. Johnson etal. i. 273.Google Scholar
  2. 10.
    C.S.P. Domestic, 1547–80, 290; A. Simpson, The Wealth of the Gentry (Cambridge, 1961), 28; Holinshed, op. cit. (1808), iv. 317–19; H.M.C., Salisbury MSS. viii. 287; Anon., An Advertisement written to a Secretary of my Lord Treasurer (1592), 15.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    Peck, op. cit. 48; C. Read, Lord Burgbley and Queen Elizabeth (1960), 437Google Scholar
  4. C. H. Warren, Sir Philip Sidney (1936), 56; H.M.C., Ancaster MSS. 288.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    T. S. Willan, The Muscovy Merchants of 1555 (Manchester, 1953), 86; C.P.R. 1566–9, 211, 274; C.S.P. Domestic, 1547–80, 288; C.S.P. Foreign, 1566–8, 463; Williamson, op. cit. 113; C.S.P. Colonial, 1513– 1616, 7, ii, 17, 37, 73; Collins, Letters and Memorials of State, i. 353; H.M.C., Salisbury MSS. ii. 320; H.M.C., Ancaster MSS. 320; Strype, Memorials, ii. 346, 349.Google Scholar
  6. 26.
    P.R.O., S.P. 12–193–91; Bacon, ‘Of Nobility’, Essays (Everyman ed., 1925), introd. O. Smeaton, 40–41.Google Scholar
  7. 29.
    Ibid. 49; Stone, op. cit. 562–6; E. M. W. Tillyard, The Elizabethan World Picture (1943), 7–15.Google Scholar
  8. 30.
    C. Read, ‘Lord Burghley’s Household Accounts’, Ec. Hist. Rev. (1956), ix. 345.Google Scholar
  9. 34.
    M. Greaves, The Blazon of Honour (1964).Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    B.M., Add. MS. 22925, f. 35; A. L. Rowse, ‘The Cecils of Alltyrynys’, E.H.R. (1960), lxxv. 54–76; Strype, Cheke, 138–9, 140–4; Haynes, op. cit. 755; P.R.O., S.P. 63–25–137; Ward, op. cit. 231–2; Strype, Annals, iii, pt. 1, 30.Google Scholar
  11. 50.
    P. M. Handover, The Second Cecil (1959), 67–69.Google Scholar
  12. 54.
    H. Foley, Records of the English Jesuits (1878), iv. 49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© B. W. Beckingsale 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. W. Beckingsale

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations