Advertisement

South-East Region: Outside London

  • Henry Pelling

Abstract

There is no doubt that the influence of London was felt everywhere in the South-East Region; but it was felt in different degrees, and there were as we shall see a few pockets of old-fashioned provincial life amid the general perhaps rather drab political homogeneity of the region. Immediately outside the L.C.C. area — which, at the time of its formation in 1888, contained the bulk of the built-up area of the metropolis and quite a large area of land still undeveloped — there was a substantial belt of suburban housing which had grown up by the end of the century and which, because it was contiguous to the L.C.C. area, must seem almost equally metropolitan in character, at least in the twentieth century. The spread outwards was, of course, uneven; its nature depended in part upon the availability of land, in part upon the quality of communications.1 Those who could afford it were already at the beginning of the period willing to ‘‘commute’’ to work in London from such comparatively distant places as Brighton ; and by the end of it, the ‘residential’ population of many of the more rural areas was becoming of much greater significance than the agricultural element.

Keywords

Religious Attendance Social Geography London Borough Thames Estuary Market Town 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    H. J. Mackinder, Britain and the British Seas (Oxford, 1907), p. 235.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    E. G. Howarth and M. Wilson, West Ham (1907), pp. 145–9.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    There was Liberal enthusiasm at the news of Hardie’s defeat. See H. Peiling, Origins of the Labour Party (1954), p. 176.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    F. Bealey and H. Peiling, Labour and Politics, 1900–1906 (1958), pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
  5. 1.
    A. C. Edwards, History of Essex (1962), p. 47.Google Scholar
  6. 1.
    A. S. Griffith-Boscawen, Memories (1925), p. 21.Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    A. H. Neve, The Tonbridge of Yesterday (Tonbridge, 1933), pp. 249 ff.; Diocese of Canterbury Visitation Returns, 1893, Lambeth Palace Library, S.R. 65.Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    A. M. Brookfield, Annals of a Chequered Life (1930), p. 162.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    F. Partridge, T.A.B. (1921), p. 69.Google Scholar
  10. 2.
    See E. A. Viscount Chilston, Chief Whip (1961).Google Scholar
  11. 1.
    E. W. Gilbert, Brighton (1954), p. 218.Google Scholar
  12. 2.
    For local feeling on this question see H. Hamilton Maughan, Some Brighton Churches (1922), p. 24.Google Scholar
  13. 1.
    L. Upcott Gill, Seaside Watering Places (1897–8), p. 172.Google Scholar
  14. 3.
    G. Leveson Gower, Years of Endeavour, 1886–1907 (1942), p. 27.Google Scholar
  15. 4.
    J. W. Mackail and G. Wyndham, Life and Letters of George Wyndham (1925), ii, 109.Google Scholar
  16. 1.
    R. Rhodes James, Rosebery (1963), p. 379.Google Scholar
  17. 2.
    J. A. Spender, Weetman Pearson, First Viscount Cowdray (1930), p. 36.Google Scholar
  18. 5.
    E. Reclus, The British Isles (1887), p. 207.Google Scholar
  19. 2.
    C. Roth, The Sassoon Dynasty (1941), pp. 179–83.Google Scholar
  20. 4.
    A Porter, Life and Letters of Sir John Henniker Heaton (1916), p. 13.Google Scholar
  21. 1.
    H. J. Hanham, Elections and Party Management (1959), p. 63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Henry Pelling 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Pelling
    • 1
  1. 1.St. John’s CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations