Skip to main content
  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

The possibility of rulers Being constitutionally driven from office in a free election is relatively new in the history of government. The voters who now hold this power in the liberal democracies can, of course, exercise it only by selecting between alternatives that have been defined by competing leaders or groups. In Britain it is the political parties that provide the focus of choice. Indeed, in the longer historical view, parties antedate the mass electorate since it was they who enfranchised the voters and mobilized their support. But the public is not the creature of the parties, and the ebbs and flows of popular favor affect, often in quite unexpected ways, the whole conduct of British government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See W. Wilson, Congressional Government, Boston, 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The election of 1964 indeed exhibited a sectional pattern of alignment hauntingly like that of 1896, although the roles of the parties had been completely reversed. See W. D. Burnham, “American Voting Behavior and the 1964 Election,” Midwest Journal of Political Science, 12 (1968), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, 1957, pp. 114–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Tullock, Towards a Mathematics of Politics, Ann Arbor, 1967, 50–61

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. Davis and M. Hinich, ‘A Mathematical Model of Policy Formation in a Democratic Society’, in J. L. Bernd, ed., Mathematical Applications in Political Science, II, Dallas, 1966, pp. 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  6. This trend is apparent in the closing chapters of A. Campbell, P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller and D. E. Stokes, The American Voter, New York, 1960, and even more clearly in Elections and the Political Order, New York, 1966, by the same authors.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. B. McCallum and A. Readman, The British General Election of 1945,Oxford, 1947

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. G. Nicholas, The British General Election of 1950, London, 1951

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. E. Butler, The British General Election of 1951, London, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. E. Butler, The British General Election of 1955, London, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. E. Butler and R. Rose, The British General Election of 1959, London, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. E. Butler and A. King, The British General Election of 1964, London, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. E. Butler and A. King, The British General Election of 1966, London, 1966

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. David Butler and Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, The British General Election of 1970, London, 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1971 David Butler and Donald Stokes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butler, D., Stokes, D. (1971). Approaches to Change. In: Political Change in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00140-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics