Skip to main content

Support for Established Institutions, Cross-cutting and the Reaction of Political Moderates

  • Chapter
Book cover Belfast: Approach to Crisis

Abstract

SIGNS of the impending crisis in Northern Ireland are scattered through the evidence reviewed in previous chapters. When interpreted contextually, these give strong indications of how and why a crisis developed. The class division underlying politics in Britain was in Belfast overlaid by religious tension and Unionist hegemony (Chapter 8). That hegemony was seen as irreversible under existing procedures because it was based on the solid support of a popular majority — the Protestants (Chapter 7). Party divisions carried over (although not as clear-cut cleavages) into political attitudes and preferences on issues (Chapter 9). Unionist councillors formed a socioeconomic elite who ran the Corporation as their personal machine, where non-Unionist representatives seemed not to belong (Chapters 4, 5, 10). Certainly a majority of Unionist adherents and councillors — seconded by the press — wished in 1966 to make conciliatory moves towards the Catholics (Chapters 9 and 11), which if carried through might have defused the imminent crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For assessment of the procedural indicators see Ian Budge et al., Political Stratification. Chapter 2. For some discussion of the contrasts in procedural support between Glasgow and Belfast see Ian Budge, ‘Support for Nation and Government among English Children: An Alternative Interpretation’, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 1 (1971), pp. 288–392. On cross-cutting in Glasgow and Belfast see Ian Budge and Cornelius O’Leary, ‘Cross-cutting Cleavages, Agreement and Compromise: An Assessment of Three Leading Hypotheses Against Scottish and Northern Irish Survey Responses’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, Vol. XV (January 1971), pp. 1–30; Ian Budge and Cornelius O’Leary, ‘Relationships Between Attitudinal and Background Crosscutting: theoretical modifications suggested by further evidence from Glasgow and Belfast’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, Vol. XVI (Summer 1972), forthcoming.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. This characterisation of cross-cutting is employed by D. Rae and M. J. Taylor in The Analysis of Political Cleavages (New Haven, 1970), p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 Ian Budge and Cornelius O’Leary

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Budge, I., O’Leary, C. (1973). Support for Established Institutions, Cross-cutting and the Reaction of Political Moderates. In: Belfast: Approach to Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00126-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics