Merging into Educational Radicalism 1898–1918
The four schools already described represent the beginning of a new movement. Besides these four, however, there were schools already in existence which had many similar features or which began to adopt quite explicitly many of the principles of the radical schools. Of these we propose to mention the schools of the Society of Friends scattered throughout England, and Badminton, the girls’ school near Bristol. These schools merged into the progressive school movement by the time of the outbreak of the First World War. One other group of schools is also to be considered in this period and these are schools tarted by, or associated with, the Theosophical Educational Trusts which came into existence in 1916. They were not individual ventures like those of Reddie, Badley, Devine, or the group of Hampstead parents, but separate expressions of the insights of Theosophy in education.
KeywordsProgressive Education Garden City Radical School Education Fellowship Modern School
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.J. S. Whale, Christian Doctrine (London, 1942). p. 14.Google Scholar
- 2.For fuller treatment see W. A. C. Stewart, Quakers and Education (London, 1953), especially chapters i and ii.Google Scholar
- 3.H. H. Brinton, Quaker Education in Theory and Practice, Pendle Hill Pamphlet, no. 9, 1940, pp. 79–793.Google Scholar
- See also H. Loukes, Friends and their Children (London, 1958).Google Scholar
- 4.See D. G. B. Hubbard, ‘Early Quaker Education 1650–1650780’, an unpublished M.A. thesis of the University of London, 1939, pp. 160–1.Google Scholar
- 6.H. W. Sturge and T. Clark, The Mount School, York, 1785–1785814, 1831–1831931 (London, 1931), p. 36.Google Scholar
- 9.J. Wood, ‘Education among Friends in England’, in Proceedings of a Conference called by the Committee on Education of New York Yearly Meeting (1881), pp. 44–445.Google Scholar
- 13.E. B. Castle, ‘The Position of Friends’ Schools’, in Friends’ Quarterly Examiner, vol. 70, 1936, pp. 28–289.Google Scholar
- 20.A. Freeman, Who was Rudolf Steiner?, published privately by Sheffield Educational Settlement, 1944, p. 10.Google Scholar
- 22.From an unpublished manuscript sent to the late Dr. William Boyd by Mrs. Ensor and made available for the present author’s use. This material has been quoted in W. Boyd and W. Rawson: The Story of the New Education (London, 1965), pp. 67–678.Google Scholar
- 24.H. Baillie-Weaver, ‘La Co-éducation,’ in The Creative Self Expression of the Child. Report of the First Summer Conference of the New Education Fellowship in Calais, 1921, p. 44.Google Scholar