Skip to main content

The Decline and Fall of Causality

  • Chapter
How I See Philosophy
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

I. The year 1927 is a landmark in the evolution of physics — the year which saw the obsequies of the notion of causality. To avoid misconceptions, it should not be thought that the concept fell a victim to the unbridled antipathy of certain physicists or their indulgence in fancies. The truth is that men of science came, very reluctantly and almost against their will, to recognize the impossibility of giving a coherent causal description of the happenings on the atomic scale, though some of them — curiously enough, amongst them Planck, Einstein, de Broglie, Schrodinger — could never bring themselves to accept wholeheartedly so drastic a renunciation of classical ideals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. ‘The most direct, and in a sense the most important, problem which our conscious knowledge of nature should enable us to solve is the anticipation of future events, so that we may arrange our present affairs in accordance with such anticipations.’ H. Hertz, Introduction to the Principles of Mechanics (translated by D. E. Jones), London, 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. E. Hulme, Speculations, London, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Schlick, ‘Die Kausalität in der gegenwärtigen Physik’, Ges. Aufsätze, Vienna, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doubts as to that were first raised by R. V. Mises (Probability, Statistics, and Truth) 2nd ed., London, 1957, and even before in an article in Die Natur-wissenschaften, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a similar example cf. M. Bom, Physics in My Generation, London, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Bohr, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, New York, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Birkhoff and J. V. Neumann, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’ (Annals of Mathematics 37 (1936); C. F. v. Weizsäcker, ‘Komplementärität und Logik’ (Die Naturwissenschaften, 1955). Even Heisenberg has given his blessing to this enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1968 The Literary Executors of F. Waismann, and R. Harré

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waismann, F. (1968). The Decline and Fall of Causality. In: Harré, R. (eds) How I See Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00102-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics