Skip to main content

Are There Alternative Logics?

  • Chapter
Book cover How I See Philosophy

Abstract

I. preliminary remarks.The writers of text-books of logic commonly take it for granted that there is a single theory, a set of rules embodying what are called the ‘laws of thought’; and that these laws are universally the same. This conception seems scarcely to accord with the present level of knowledge. For we do already possess distinct logics — if this term is used to denote precisely elaborated formalized systems: e.g., logics including or excluding a Theory of Types, systems admitting or barring the law of excluded middle, etc. Perhaps one might add that the rise of a conventionalistic mode of thinking — emanating from mathematics — today favours attempts to construct novel logics. Here two ways present themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a symbolic system with a simple hierarchy of types see: F. P. Ramsey, ‘The Foundations of Mathematics’, Proc. Lond.Math. Soc., vol. 25, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a symbolic system without a hierarchy of types see: A. Church, ‘A Set of Postulates for the Foundation of Logic’, Annals of Math., 33, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  3. His system has been proved inconsistent by S. C. Koeene and J. B. Rosser, Annals of Math., 36, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The impossibility of a system along such lines has not been proved either. Cf. K. Gödel, ‘Russell’s Mathematical Logic’, in The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston, 1944, p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. E. J. Brouwer, ‘Über die Bedeutung des Satzes von ausgeschlossenen Dritten …’, J. Math., 154, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Heyting, ‘Die formalen Regeln der intuitionistischen Logik’, Ber. Akad Berlin, 1930. See Intuitionism, Amsterdam, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Birkhoff and J. V. Neumann, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Ann. of Math., 37, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Strauss, ‘Zur Begrndung der statistischen “Transformationstheorie” der Quantenphysik’, Ber. Akad., Berlin, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1968 The Literary Executors of F. Waismann, and R. Harré

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waismann, F. (1968). Are There Alternative Logics?. In: Harré, R. (eds) How I See Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00102-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics