Abstract
The satisfaction of the jurisdictional criteria of the International Criminal Court, including specific and general gravity ‘tests’ and ‘inability or unwillingness genuinely to investigate or prosecute’, is reviewed. The Office of the Prosecutor’s decision to open a preliminary examination into the situation in Iraq and the reaction thereto is set out. The alleged abuse of detainees, at every phase of interaction with British personnel, is analysed, including extracts of witness testimony. The alleged use of prohibited interrogation techniques is reflected upon in the context of the Joint Forward Interrogation Team (JFIT). The role and tasks of the Iraq Historic Allegation Team and the supporting role of the Iraq Historic Allegations Prosecution Team (IHAPT) are summarised, including challenges to independence, partiality and capability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Timothy Wood
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wood, T. (2016). ECCHR/PIL Allegations of Abuse by British Personnel. In: Detainee Abuse During Op TELIC: ‘A Few Rotten Apples’?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-58880-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-58880-7_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-88772-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58880-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)