Shakespeare and the Market in His Own Day
Writing only shortly after Shakespeare’s death, Thomas Randolph (and/or his reviser F. J.) claim that the world’s most famous dramatist was motivated to write his plays by the ‘Great God of Money’. It is an assertion which would have troubled many early Shakespeare scholars, most of whom were reluctant to see Shakespeare as a commercially driven artist. Indeed, as Douglas Bruster notes, ‘for a long time, most commentators ignored the economic bases of Shakespeare’s theatre’ and when they did mention it ‘they typically portrayed it as regrettable’.2 However, as recent research on the early modern stage has made clear, the world of which Shakespeare was a part was a commercial — as well as a creative — industry; and Shakespeare’s success within it is evidence not just of his artistic talent, but of the commercial ‘nous’ of himself and his fellow players in the company with whom he worked for most of his career: the Lord Chamberlain’s (later the King’s) players.
KeywordsGlobe Theatre City Wall Artistic Talent National Biography Fellow Player
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bentley, Gerald Eades (1971) The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare’s Time (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
- Blayney, Peter W. M. (1997) ‘The Publication of Playbooks’ in John D. Cox and David Scott Kastan (eds) A New History of Early English Drama (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 383–422.Google Scholar
- Bruster, Douglas (2003) ‘On a Certain Tendency in Economic Criticism of Shakespeare’ in Linda Woodbridge (ed.) Money and the Age of Shakespeare: Essays in New Economic Criticism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 67–77.Google Scholar
- Erne, Lukas (2003) Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Foakes, R. A. (2002) (ed.) Henslowe’s Diary, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Gurr, Andrew (2004) The Shakespeare Company, 1594–1642 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Gurr, Andrew (2012) Shakespeare’s Opposites: The Admiral’s Company, 1594–1625 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- — (2005) The Shakespearean Stage, 1574–1642, 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Holland, Peter Holland (2013) ‘Shakespeare, William (1564–1616)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, online edn, http://www.oxforddnb.com.
- Ingram, William (2004) ‘The Economics of Playing’ in Arthur F. Kinney (ed.) A Companion to Renaissance Drama (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 313–27.Google Scholar
- Kastan, David Scott (2008) ‘“To Think These Trifles Some-Thing”: Shakespearean Playbooks and the Claims of Authorship’, Shakespeare Studies, 36: 37–48.Google Scholar
- Keenan, Siobhan (2014) Acting Companies and Their Plays in Shakespeare’s London (London: Arden Shakespeare).Google Scholar
- van Es, Bart (2013) Shakespeare in Company (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- Vickers, Brian (2002) Shakespeare, Co-Author (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
- West, Anthony James (2001) The Shakespeare First Folio (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- Wiggins, Martin (2000) Shakespeare and the Drama of His Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar