Abstract
When can the courts review decisions made by the government? The answer is in a simple principle: if the concerned authority has “come to a conclusion so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever have come to it,” [emphasis added] then the courts shall exercise their power of review.1 Over the years, this dictum has not only formed the basis of several matters seeking review of governmental actions, but has also come to depict certain attributes of “unreasonableness.” Foremost, the question of legitimacy and authority of the decision-maker is crucial in deciding whether the review must be considered and whether the impugned action must be set aside on the grounds of inadequate basis. Furthermore, there is an inherent element of questioning the rationality and logic of the action, and the grounds of irrationality or arbitrariness are most certainly subjected to the power of judicial review. Finally, this principle has also been interpreted to impose on the executive a duty to ensure that all their actions are within accepted moral standards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
S. P. Sathe, Administrative Law (Seventh Edition, New Delhi: Lexis-Nexis Butterworths, 2004), at p. 170.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Anil B. Suraj
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suraj, A.B. (2016). Indian Judiciary and Enforceable Measures against Crony Capitalism. In: Khatri, N., Ojha, A.K. (eds) Crony Capitalism in India. Palgrave Studies in Indian Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-58287-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-58287-4_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58286-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58287-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)