This Death Which Is Not One: The Postcolonial Author as Public Intellectual

  • Nicole Simek


In a neoliberal age marked by intense pressures both to privatize and to instrumentalize intellectual labor, the possibilities for public interventions by theorists and academics more broadly can appear alarmingly restricted. Public intellectualism seems to be on the verge of dying, if it is not already dead, as the shrinking public sphere, and the logics dominant within it, are reshaped by neoliberal economic principles and values. Yet like theory, whose death has been repeatedly announced (and met variously with joy and mourning), public intellectualism lives on, and the future of its afterlife has yet to be fully determined.


Public Sphere Public Intellectualism French Citizen Authorial Voice Intellectual Labor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Breleur, Ernest et al., “A Plea for the ‘Products’ of High Necessity,” trans. Isabelle Métral. L’Humanité, March 5, 2009.
  2. Brosset, Alain and Daniel Maragnès. Les Antilles dans l’impasse. Paris: Éditions Caribéenes/L’Harrmattan, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Chamoiseau, Patrick. Écrire en pays dominé. Paris: Gallimard, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Coe, Richard N. When the Grass Was Taller: Autobiography and the Experience of Childhood. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Condé, Maryse. La vie sans fards. Paris: Editions JJ Lattès, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. Dalleo, Raphael. Caribbean Literature and the Public Sphere: From the Plantation to the Postcolonial. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Gallagher, Mary. “Postcolonial Poetics: l’exception francophone?” Modern & Contemporary France 18.2, 2010: 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glissant, Edouard. Caribbean Discourse: Selected Essays. Trans. Michael Dash. Caraf Books. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. Henry, Paget. Caliban’s Reason: Introducing Afro-Caribbean Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Le Hir, Marie-Pierre. “Stendhal et l’invention de l’intellectuel.” Nineteenth-Century French Studies 36.1–2, 2007: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyotard, Jean-François. Just Gaming. Theory and History of Literature, vol. 20. Trans. Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. Maragnès, Daniel. “Contre la mort lente.” Les Antilles dans l’impasse?,” ed. Alain Brossat and Daniel Maragnès, 55–88. Paris: Éditions Caribéennes, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. Moore-Gilbert, Bart. “A Concern Peculiar to Western Man? Postcolonial Reconsiderations of Autobiography as Genre.” In Postcolonial Poetics: Genre and Form. Francophone Postcolonial Studies, vol. 2, eds. Patrick Crowley and Jane Hiddleston. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2011, 91–108.Google Scholar
  14. Trezise, Tomas. Witnessing Witnessing: On the Reception of Holocaust Survivor Testimony. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Watts, Richard. “The ‘Wounds of Locality’: Living and Writing the Local in Patrick Chamoiseau’s Ecrire en pays dominé.” French Forum 28.1, Winter 2003: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Nicole Simek 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Simek

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations